Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Los Angeles using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 236 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:53 (From 01:07:48 to 57:55) | 87.6% |
| Rowing | 00:56 (From 07:00 to 06:04) | 8.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:28 (From 06:10 to 05:42) | 4.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 03:37 to 03:37) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 06:31 to 06:31) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 06:32 to 06:32) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:40 to 02:40) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 05:30 to 05:30) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 04:17 to 04:17) | 0.0% |
| Pyon Arianna | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:38 | 00:00 | 06:25 +01:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 06:10 | 07:38 | 05:37 +00:33 | 06:25 +01:13 |
| Running 2 | 07:04 | 13:48 | 06:57 +00:07 | 12:02 +01:46 |
| Sled Push | 03:37 | 20:52 | 03:35 +00:02 | 18:59 +01:53 |
| Running 3 | 07:48 | 24:29 | 07:29 +00:19 | 22:34 +01:55 |
| Sled Pull | 06:31 | 32:17 | 08:06 -01:35 | 30:03 +02:14 |
| Running 4 | 08:28 | 38:48 | 07:32 +00:56 | 38:09 +00:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:32 | 47:16 | 09:46 -03:14 | 45:41 +01:35 |
| Running 5 | 08:46 | 53:48 | 07:55 +00:51 | 55:27 -01:39 |
| Rowing | 07:00 | 01:02:34 | 06:06 +00:54 | 01:03:22 -00:48 |
| Running 6 | 08:41 | 01:09:34 | 07:45 +00:56 | 01:09:28 +00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:40 | 01:18:15 | 02:56 -00:16 | 01:17:13 +01:02 |
| Running 7 | 08:38 | 01:20:55 | 07:44 +00:54 | 01:20:09 +00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:30 | 01:29:33 | 07:15 -01:45 | 01:27:53 +01:40 |
| Running 8 | 10:49 | 01:35:03 | 08:51 +01:58 | 01:35:08 -00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 04:17 | 01:45:52 | 07:54 -03:37 | 01:43:59 +01:53 |
| Roxzone | 11:55 | 02:01:55 | 10:02 +01:53 | 02:01:55 |
Based on the splits analysis, Arianna's best running lap was 00:07:04. However, there were several segments where she lost time compared to the average, including Running 1, Ski Erg, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8. The segments with the most time lost were Run Total, Roxzone, Running 8, Running 1, Best Lap, Rowing, Running 4, Running 7, Running 5, Running 6, Ski Erg, and Running 3.
10. Roxzone: Arianna spent 01:59 longer than the average in this segment. To improve her overall fitness and transition time, she should focus on improving her cardiovascular endurance through interval training and incorporating specific drills that mimic the transitions between exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Srivastava Anvita | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:01:25 | |
| Wirtgen Melanie | 2024 Stockholm | 02:02:04 | |
| Van Drooge Enya | 2022 Amsterdam | 02:02:11 | |
| Ochmann Katharina | 2023 Hamburg | 02:02:07 | |
| Blight Kate | 2023 London | 02:02:20 | |
| Baerselman Le Gros Natalie | 2024 London | 02:02:02 | |
| Robinson Abbie | 2024 Glasgow | 02:01:42 | |
| Nelson Roisin | 2023 Manchester | 02:02:13 | |
| Collins Siobhan | 2024 Glasgow | 02:02:25 | |
| Wagner Jasmin | 2019 Hamburg | 02:02:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Anaheim Valencia Adrien, Pyon Arianna | 01:35:26 | |
| 2023 Los Angeles Pyon Arianna, Yu Stella | 01:58:48 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Pyon Arianna
