Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pointing Graham's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pointing Graham's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pointing Graham's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pointing Graham's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:48 | 52:06 to 46:18 | 66.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:54 | 08:00 to 06:06 | 21.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:01 | 06:44 to 05:43 | 11.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:47 to 03:47 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:19 to 07:19 | 0.0% |
| Pointing Graham | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:38 | 00:00 | 04:59 +00:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 05:38 | 04:37 -00:14 | 04:59 +00:39 |
| Running 2 | 07:22 | 10:01 | 05:25 +01:57 | 09:36 +00:25 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 17:23 | 03:15 -00:50 | 15:01 +02:22 |
| Running 3 | 06:14 | 19:48 | 05:59 +00:15 | 18:16 +01:32 |
| Sled Pull | 03:47 | 26:02 | 05:39 -01:52 | 24:15 +01:47 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 29:49 | 05:56 +00:20 | 29:54 -00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:00 | 36:05 | 06:20 +01:40 | 35:50 +00:15 |
| Running 5 | 06:27 | 44:05 | 06:10 +00:17 | 42:10 +01:55 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 50:32 | 05:03 -00:16 | 48:20 +02:12 |
| Running 6 | 06:08 | 55:19 | 05:59 +00:09 | 53:23 +01:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 01:01:27 | 02:26 -00:24 | 59:22 +02:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 01:03:29 | 05:57 +00:01 | 01:01:48 +01:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:44 | 01:09:27 | 05:54 +00:50 | 01:07:45 +01:42 |
| Running 8 | 08:06 | 01:16:11 | 06:51 +01:15 | 01:13:39 +02:32 |
| Wall Balls | 07:19 | 01:24:17 | 07:41 -00:22 | 01:20:30 +03:47 |
| Roxzone | 04:56 | 01:36:26 | 08:15 -03:19 | 01:36:26 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Graham struggled in several running segments, namely Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 7, and Running 8. He also faced challenges in the Burpees Broad Jump and Sandbag Lunges segments. These areas should be the focus for improvement in his training.
Overall, Graham Pointing's performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race was commendable. By focusing on improving his running performance, specifically his transition time and endurance, as well as addressing the weaker segments, Graham has the potential to enhance his overall performance in future races. Incorporating the suggested training strategies, drills, and techniques will help him build the necessary strength, speed, and endurance to excel in his age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ness Chris | 2021 Birmingham | 01:35:59 | |
| Olsson Patrik | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:26 | |
| Taeymans Tom | 2024 Malaga | 01:36:07 | |
| Lane Simon | 2022 London | 01:36:27 | |
| Verges Moreno Joan | 2023 Barcelona | 01:36:49 | |
| Guevara Mora Eric Daniel | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:36:03 | |
| Szehidewicz Alex | 2022 London | 01:36:25 | |
| Becker Dominik | 2024 Berlin | 01:36:06 | |
| Coyne Charles | 2024 Melbourne | 01:36:23 | |
| Chowdhury Shaeed | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
