Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pease Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pease Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pease Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pease Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:41 | 09:11 to 06:30 | 49.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:54 | 07:03 to 05:09 | 34.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:29 | 05:26 to 04:57 | 8.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:30 to 02:10 | 6.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:03 | 05:27 to 05:24 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:42 to 40:42 | 0.0% |
| Pease Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:11 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 05:11 | 04:30 -00:12 | 04:47 +00:24 |
| Running 2 | 04:20 | 09:29 | 05:07 -00:47 | 09:17 +00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 13:49 | 03:03 -00:34 | 14:24 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 04:36 | 16:18 | 05:35 -00:59 | 17:27 -01:09 |
| Sled Pull | 05:26 | 20:54 | 05:12 +00:14 | 23:02 -02:08 |
| Running 4 | 04:56 | 26:20 | 05:34 -00:38 | 28:14 -01:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:27 | 31:16 | 05:42 -00:15 | 33:48 -02:32 |
| Running 5 | 05:12 | 36:43 | 05:45 -00:33 | 39:30 -02:47 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 41:55 | 04:53 -00:06 | 45:15 -03:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:21 | 46:42 | 05:35 -00:14 | 50:08 -03:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 52:03 | 02:17 +00:13 | 55:43 -03:40 |
| Running 7 | 05:13 | 54:33 | 05:34 -00:21 | 58:00 -03:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:03 | 59:46 | 05:25 +01:38 | 01:03:34 -03:48 |
| Running 8 | 05:56 | 01:06:49 | 06:16 -00:20 | 01:08:59 -02:10 |
| Wall Balls | 09:11 | 01:12:45 | 06:54 +02:17 | 01:15:15 -02:30 |
| Roxzone | 07:38 | 01:29:26 | 07:17 +00:21 | 01:29:26 |
Matthew Pease showed a strong overall performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. He ranked in the top 40% of all athletes and in the 39% of his age group (40-44 years). His total running time was faster than average by 3 minutes and 45 seconds, highlighting his significant strength in running. His best running lap time was 4 minutes and 20 seconds, further emphasizing his running prowess. Matthew started the race slightly slower than average in Running 1, but quickly picked up the pace, consistently performing faster than average in the subsequent running segments. This suggests that he could benefit from a faster start in future races. Given his overall running time compared to his strength-based segments, it appears that Matthew has a more runner-oriented profile.
To improve overall race performance, Matthew should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Malkera Mohammad | 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:26 | |
| NelsonLatu Aisea | 2024 Perth | 01:29:32 | |
| Van Sandick Joost | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:29:11 | |
| Hergenröther Mario | 2018 Hamburg | 01:29:06 | |
| Person Gary | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:59 | |
| Subotic Boris | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:29:32 | |
| Chiang Tin Long Sunny | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:29:38 | |
| Kern Mark | 2023 Anaheim | 01:29:04 | |
| Hinchley Tony | 2023 London | 01:29:46 | |
| Smith Gary | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:37:54 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
