Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Hannover using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Niemann Markus's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Niemann Markus's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Niemann Markus's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Niemann Markus's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:46 | 56:53 to 49:07 | 98.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:41 to 02:36 | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:37 to 06:37 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:30 to 07:30 | 0.0% |
| Niemann Markus | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:38 | 00:00 | 05:12 +00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 05:38 | 04:42 -00:04 | 05:12 +00:26 |
| Running 2 | 07:56 | 10:16 | 05:43 +02:13 | 09:54 +00:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 18:12 | 03:31 -01:15 | 15:37 +02:35 |
| Running 3 | 07:56 | 20:28 | 06:17 +01:39 | 19:08 +01:20 |
| Sled Pull | 03:35 | 28:24 | 06:04 -02:29 | 25:25 +02:59 |
| Running 4 | 08:14 | 31:59 | 06:17 +01:57 | 31:29 +00:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:37 | 40:13 | 06:56 -00:19 | 37:46 +02:27 |
| Running 5 | 08:42 | 46:50 | 06:33 +02:09 | 44:42 +02:08 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 55:32 | 05:12 -00:12 | 51:15 +04:17 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 01:00:32 | 06:22 -00:15 | 56:27 +04:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:41 | 01:06:39 | 02:36 +00:05 | 01:02:49 +03:50 |
| Running 7 | 06:04 | 01:09:20 | 06:19 -00:15 | 01:05:25 +03:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:18 | 01:15:24 | 06:24 -02:06 | 01:11:44 +03:40 |
| Running 8 | 06:19 | 01:19:42 | 07:28 -01:09 | 01:18:08 +01:34 |
| Wall Balls | 07:30 | 01:26:01 | 08:23 -00:53 | 01:25:36 +00:25 |
| Roxzone | 09:36 | 01:43:01 | 09:02 +00:34 | 01:43:01 |
Based on the splits analysis, we can see that Markus struggled the most in the running segments, particularly Running 2, Running 5, Running 4, and Running 3. These segments accounted for the majority of his time lost during the race. Additionally, his best lap time was slower than the average, indicating that he needs improvement in his running performance.
In conclusion, Markus Niemann's performance in the Hyrox race in Hannover was solid, but there is room for improvement. By focusing on his running performance, incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, and improving his overall fitness and transition time, Markus can enhance his performance in future races. With targeted training and race strategies, he has the potential to achieve better results and improve his overall rank.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellis Neil | 2024 Birmingham | 01:42:34 | |
| Gil Hidalgo Alejandro | 2023 Madrid | 01:42:51 | |
| Terloo Tim | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:42:39 | |
| Schlegel Marco | 2022 Hamburg | 01:43:29 | |
| Van Asselt Pim | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:42:43 | |
| Eka Firmansyah Septian | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:43:24 | |
| Diaz Infante Velasco Saul | 2024 Mexico City | 01:43:07 | |
| Chumbley Leighton | 2024 Birmingham | 01:42:45 | |
| Keaney Barry | 2023 Hamburg | 01:43:21 | |
| Winter Tobias | 2024 Hamburg | 01:42:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Hamburg | 01:30:52 | |
| 2020 Hannover | 01:37:30 | |
| 2018 Hamburg | 01:38:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
