Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 959 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:10 (From 04:35 to 03:25) | 29.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:43 (From 02:47 to 02:04) | 18.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:42 (From 04:25 to 03:43) | 17.9% |
| BBJ | 00:29 (From 04:56 to 04:27) | 12.3% |
| Rowing | 00:17 (From 05:13 to 04:56) | 7.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:15 (From 04:37 to 04:22) | 6.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 (From 04:56 to 04:43) | 5.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 (From 01:55 to 01:49) | 2.6% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 39:16 to 39:16) | 0.0% |
| Mckeaney Cara | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:37 | 00:00 | 04:38 +00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 05:37 | 04:52 +00:04 | 04:38 +00:59 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 10:33 | 04:54 -00:16 | 09:30 +01:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:47 | 15:11 | 02:26 +00:21 | 14:24 +00:47 |
| Running 3 | 04:36 | 17:58 | 05:10 -00:34 | 16:50 +01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:37 | 22:34 | 04:57 -00:20 | 22:00 +00:34 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 27:11 | 05:09 -00:19 | 26:57 +00:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:56 | 32:01 | 05:02 -00:06 | 32:06 -00:05 |
| Running 5 | 04:57 | 36:57 | 05:16 -00:19 | 37:08 -00:11 |
| Rowing | 05:13 | 41:54 | 05:06 +00:07 | 42:24 -00:30 |
| Running 6 | 04:49 | 47:07 | 05:12 -00:23 | 47:30 -00:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 51:56 | 02:01 -00:06 | 52:42 -00:46 |
| Running 7 | 04:51 | 53:51 | 05:10 -00:19 | 54:43 -00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:25 | 58:42 | 04:06 +00:19 | 59:53 -01:11 |
| Running 8 | 05:00 | 01:03:07 | 05:28 -00:28 | 01:03:59 -00:52 |
| Wall Balls | 04:35 | 01:08:07 | 04:08 +00:27 | 01:09:27 -01:20 |
| Roxzone | 06:37 | 01:19:12 | 05:37 +01:00 | 01:19:12 |
Cara Mckeaney demonstrated an impressive performance, ranking in the top 4% of 4107 athletes overall and top 7% in her age group. Her overall time was 01:19:12, with a total running time of 00:39:16, which is 01:59 faster than the average. This indicates a strong running profile, and her best running lap was a swift 00:04:36.
Her performance across the running segments was generally faster than the average, suggesting an excellent pacing strategy. However, she started off slower in the first running segment, which may indicate initial pacing issues or a strategic approach to conserve energy for later segments. The consistent improvement in her running times from the second segment onwards indicates a strong ability to maintain and increase speed throughout the race.
The segments with the most potential for improvement include the Roxzone, Wall Balls, Sandbag Lunges, Sled Push, and Burpees Broad Jump. These segments were slower than the average and require targeted training to improve.
Considering her performance, Cara should focus on maintaining a consistent pace in the initial running segment. Starting off too slow can lead to lost time that can be difficult to make up later in the race. Additionally, she should focus on improving her transition times, especially in the Roxzone. Practicing transitions and focusing on recovery strategies during training can help improve efficiency during the race.
Given her strong running profile, Cara should continue to leverage this strength while also incorporating more strength training to improve in the slower segments. This could lead to a more balanced performance and potentially a higher overall rank in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanier Sarah | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:18:52 | |
| Meakin Emily | 2023 Birmingham | 01:19:23 | |
| Hilton Katy | 2023 Chicago | 01:19:27 | |
| Shilland Kate | 2023 London | 01:18:47 | |
| Borg Louise | 2024 Stockholm | 01:19:26 | |
| Streng Resi | 2021 Leipzig | 01:19:08 | |
| Townsend Emily | 2024 Sydney | 01:19:03 | |
| Rogozhina Alissa | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:19:35 | |
| Gray Susan Caroline | 2023 London | 01:19:05 | |
| Ortiz Jennifer | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:19:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London Mckeaney Cara | 01:23:37 | |
| 2024 Manchester Mckeaney Cara | 01:17:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Mckeaney Cara
