Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jones Dan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jones Dan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jones Dan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jones Dan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:44 | 43:02 to 40:18 | 96.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:06 | 04:47 to 04:41 | 3.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:33 to 02:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:40 to 03:40 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Jones Dan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:18 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:06 | 05:18 | 04:24 -00:18 | 04:29 +00:49 |
| Running 2 | 04:37 | 09:24 | 04:50 -00:13 | 08:53 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:33 | 14:01 | 02:49 -00:16 | 13:43 +00:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 16:34 | 05:13 +00:33 | 16:32 +00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:18 | 22:20 | 04:44 -00:26 | 21:45 +00:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 26:38 | 05:12 +00:01 | 26:29 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:47 | 31:51 | 05:01 -00:14 | 31:41 +00:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:50 | 36:38 | 05:21 +00:29 | 36:42 -00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 42:28 | 04:44 -00:08 | 42:03 +00:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:18 | 47:04 | 05:14 +00:04 | 46:47 +00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 52:22 | 02:07 -00:11 | 52:01 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 05:24 | 54:18 | 05:13 +00:11 | 54:08 +00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:40 | 59:42 | 04:52 -01:12 | 59:21 +00:21 |
| Running 8 | 05:40 | 01:03:22 | 05:43 -00:03 | 01:04:13 -00:51 |
| Wall Balls | 05:00 | 01:09:02 | 06:14 -01:14 | 01:09:56 -00:54 |
| Roxzone | 08:40 | 01:22:34 | 06:24 +02:16 | 01:22:34 |
Dan Jones delivered a notable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. His overall rank was 1157, which placed him in the top 28% of all athletes, and he was in the top 33% of his age group. Dan's total running time was slower than average, indicating that he may have a strength-based profile. His initial pacing seemed slightly slower than the average, particularly evident in his first running segment. However, he managed to pick up the pace in subsequent running segments. His strength was clearly demonstrated in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges segments where he outperformed the average times. His remarkable performance in these strength-based exercises highlights his potential as a strength athlete.
Based on his performance, Dan might benefit from implementing the following strategies during his races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Meers Simon | 2022 Maastricht | 01:22:23 | |
| Saminadin Ganesh | 2024 Köln | 01:22:36 | |
| Kocheisen Michael | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:22:52 | |
| De Jonge Adrie | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:56 | |
| MartinBaeza Matias | 2024 Madrid | 01:22:32 | |
| Butty Kieran | 2023 Melbourne | 01:23:03 | |
| Hein Rico | 2024 Köln | 01:22:49 | |
| Krell Michael | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:22:04 | |
| Verschelden Michael | 2022 New York | 01:22:41 | |
| Avant Christopher | 2024 Brisbane | 01:22:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:36:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
