Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Halls Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Halls Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Halls Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Halls Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:01 | 05:46 to 04:45 | 31.3% |
| Run Total | 00:42 | 36:46 to 36:04 | 21.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:35 | 04:21 to 03:46 | 17.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:22 | 04:14 to 03:52 | 11.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 01:56 to 01:40 | 8.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 02:23 to 02:08 | 7.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 03:47 to 03:43 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Halls Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 04:06 -00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 03:41 | 04:15 -00:10 | 04:06 -00:25 |
| Running 2 | 04:34 | 07:46 | 04:25 +00:09 | 08:21 -00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 12:20 | 02:31 -00:08 | 12:46 -00:26 |
| Running 3 | 04:37 | 14:43 | 04:45 -00:08 | 15:17 -00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 03:47 | 19:20 | 04:08 -00:21 | 20:02 -00:42 |
| Running 4 | 04:41 | 23:07 | 04:44 -00:03 | 24:10 -01:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:21 | 27:48 | 04:18 +00:03 | 28:54 -01:06 |
| Running 5 | 04:43 | 32:09 | 04:52 -00:09 | 33:12 -01:03 |
| Rowing | 04:21 | 36:52 | 04:32 -00:11 | 38:04 -01:12 |
| Running 6 | 04:33 | 41:13 | 04:46 -00:13 | 42:36 -01:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 45:46 | 01:53 +00:03 | 47:22 -01:36 |
| Running 7 | 04:37 | 47:42 | 04:45 -00:08 | 49:15 -01:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:14 | 52:19 | 04:15 -00:01 | 54:00 -01:41 |
| Running 8 | 05:24 | 56:33 | 05:05 +00:19 | 58:15 -01:42 |
| Wall Balls | 05:46 | 01:01:57 | 05:22 +00:24 | 01:03:20 -01:23 |
| Roxzone | 06:31 | 01:14:04 | 05:22 +01:09 | 01:14:04 |
Andrew's performance in the running segments was particularly noteworthy. His total running time of 00:36:46 was faster than the average, indicating that he has a strong running profile. This suggests that Andrew should focus on maintaining and improving his running abilities to further enhance his performance.
In conclusion, Andrew Halls had a strong performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race, particularly in the running segments. To further enhance his performance, he should focus on improving his overall fitness, reducing transition time, and addressing the specific areas of improvement mentioned above. By implementing the suggested training strategies, exercises, and race strategies, Andrew can continue to excel in future races and further improve his overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zwiener Martin | 2023 Hannover | 01:14:16 | |
| Thomas Jacob | 2022 Chicago | 01:14:26 | |
| Edmondson Grant | 2022 Dallas | 01:13:36 | |
| Mengdehl Steven Ragnar | 2022 Hamburg | 01:14:30 | |
| Teba Castillo Javier | 2023 Valencia | 01:14:00 | |
| Armour Marc | 2024 Dublin | 01:13:59 | |
| Michel Markus | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:14:14 | |
| Hammett Luke | 2023 Glasgow | 01:13:37 | |
| Chalabi Zaid | 2023 Birmingham | 01:14:33 | |
| Shanahan Nick | 2024 Malaga | 01:13:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
