Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Vega John's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Vega John's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Vega John's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Vega John's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:40 | 39:47 to 38:07 | 42.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:54 | 04:56 to 04:02 | 22.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 | 04:46 to 04:12 | 14.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:18 | 04:30 to 04:12 | 7.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:24 to 04:13 | 4.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:08 | 05:20 to 05:12 | 3.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 01:54 to 01:48 | 2.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:24 to 02:20 | 1.7% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:33 to 04:32 | 0.4% |
| De Vega John | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:48 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 03:48 | 04:19 +00:05 | 04:18 -00:30 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 08:12 | 04:37 +00:01 | 08:37 -00:25 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 12:50 | 02:40 -00:16 | 13:14 -00:24 |
| Running 3 | 04:55 | 15:14 | 05:00 -00:05 | 15:54 -00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 04:56 | 20:09 | 04:26 +00:30 | 20:54 -00:45 |
| Running 4 | 04:59 | 25:05 | 04:58 +00:01 | 25:20 -00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:30 | 30:04 | 04:36 -00:06 | 30:18 -00:14 |
| Running 5 | 05:03 | 34:34 | 05:06 -00:03 | 34:54 -00:20 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 39:37 | 04:38 -00:05 | 40:00 -00:23 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 44:10 | 05:00 -00:01 | 44:38 -00:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 49:09 | 02:00 -00:06 | 49:38 -00:29 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 51:03 | 04:59 +00:12 | 51:38 -00:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:46 | 56:14 | 04:32 +00:14 | 56:37 -00:23 |
| Running 8 | 06:18 | 01:01:00 | 05:26 +00:52 | 01:01:09 -00:09 |
| Wall Balls | 05:20 | 01:07:18 | 05:42 -00:22 | 01:06:35 +00:43 |
| Roxzone | 05:41 | 01:18:09 | 05:52 -00:11 | 01:18:09 |
John De Vega's performance in the 2024 Sydney Hyrox race was commendable, finishing in the top 23% overall and top 28% in his age group. His total running time was nearly on par with the average, indicating a balanced profile with a slight emphasis on running strength. John started the race strongly, with the first four running segments showing above-average pace, suggesting an aggressive early strategy. However, his performance in the latter stages, particularly in the running segments, showed signs of fatigue, indicating potential improvements in endurance or pacing strategies.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Milton Ross | 2022 Birmingham | 01:18:25 | |
| Kuppler Julian | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:30 | |
| Hoffmeister Michael | 2022 Bremen | 01:18:06 | |
| Little Stevie | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:04 | |
| Donnelly Mark | 2023 Manchester | 01:18:26 | |
| Tamburini Hervé | 2024 Marseille | 01:18:16 | |
| Gibbins Nick | 2021 London | 01:18:25 | |
| Blackwell George | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:18:25 | |
| Van Duivenbooden Jerry | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:18:18 | |
| Staines Louis | 2024 Brisbane | 01:18:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
