Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clarke Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clarke Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clarke Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clarke Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:19 | 47:59 to 45:40 | 64.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:43 | 07:52 to 07:09 | 19.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 03:32 to 03:08 | 11.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 06:07 to 05:57 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Clarke Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 04:57 +00:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 04:57 | 04:35 -00:14 | 04:57 +00:00 |
| Running 2 | 05:15 | 09:18 | 05:23 -00:08 | 09:32 -00:14 |
| Sled Push | 03:32 | 14:33 | 03:11 +00:21 | 14:55 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 06:13 | 18:05 | 05:53 +00:20 | 18:06 -00:01 |
| Sled Pull | 04:56 | 24:18 | 05:31 -00:35 | 23:59 +00:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 29:14 | 05:52 -00:02 | 29:30 -00:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:07 | 35:04 | 06:09 -00:02 | 35:22 -00:18 |
| Running 5 | 06:30 | 41:11 | 06:04 +00:26 | 41:31 -00:20 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 47:41 | 05:01 -00:25 | 47:35 +00:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:45 | 52:17 | 05:54 -00:09 | 52:36 -00:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 58:02 | 02:24 -00:27 | 58:30 -00:28 |
| Running 7 | 06:07 | 59:59 | 05:53 +00:14 | 01:00:54 -00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:32 | 01:06:06 | 05:46 -00:14 | 01:06:47 -00:41 |
| Running 8 | 07:27 | 01:11:38 | 06:45 +00:42 | 01:12:33 -00:55 |
| Wall Balls | 07:52 | 01:19:05 | 07:24 +00:28 | 01:19:18 -00:13 |
| Roxzone | 07:54 | 01:34:41 | 07:59 -00:05 | 01:34:41 |
Based on the provided splits analysis, Jack's performance was relatively consistent across the different segments. His best running lap was completed in 00:04:57, which was only 11 seconds slower than the average. However, there were areas where he lost time, such as Running 3 (00:06:13, 18 seconds slower than average) and Running 5 (00:06:30, 27 seconds slower than average).
In conclusion, Jack Clarke had a solid performance in the 2022 London Hyrox race. While he demonstrated strength in certain segments, there are areas where he can improve his performance, particularly in running segments and exercises requiring upper body strength. By implementing the suggested training strategies, incorporating specific exercises, and focusing on race strategies, Jack can enhance his overall performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Boljevic Stevan | 2024 Stockholm | 01:34:49 | |
| Reeders Lachlan | 2023 Melbourne | 01:35:11 | |
| Holwerc Jornt | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:34:35 | |
| Cotter Adam | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:34:24 | |
| Pizarro Jeronimo | 2019 Miami | 01:34:12 | |
| Bermingham Johnny | 2024 Dallas | 01:34:59 | |
| Beveridge Ryan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:34:31 | |
| Gregory Ross | 2024 New York | 01:34:43 | |
| Paek Sanghyun | 2024 Incheon | 01:34:24 | |
| Van Arragon Yoran | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:34:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
