Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Köln using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Theisen Marco's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Theisen Marco's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Theisen Marco's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Theisen Marco's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:28 | 37:15 to 35:47 | 30.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:17 | 05:06 to 03:49 | 26.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:40 | 05:22 to 04:42 | 13.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:34 | 04:17 to 03:43 | 11.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:28 | 02:35 to 02:07 | 9.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:18 to 04:06 | 4.1% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:34 to 04:24 | 3.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 01:40 to 01:39 | 0.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:25 to 03:25 | 0.0% |
| Theisen Marco | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:20 | 00:00 | 04:06 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 03:20 | 04:15 +00:03 | 04:06 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 04:36 | 07:38 | 04:23 +00:13 | 08:21 -00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 12:14 | 02:30 +00:05 | 12:44 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 14:49 | 04:43 +00:16 | 15:14 -00:25 |
| Sled Pull | 03:25 | 19:48 | 04:08 -00:43 | 19:57 -00:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:03 | 23:13 | 04:42 +00:21 | 24:05 -00:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:17 | 28:16 | 04:15 +00:02 | 28:47 -00:31 |
| Running 5 | 05:10 | 32:33 | 04:49 +00:21 | 33:02 -00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 37:43 | 04:32 +00:02 | 37:51 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 04:57 | 42:17 | 04:43 +00:14 | 42:23 -00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:40 | 47:14 | 01:52 -00:12 | 47:06 +00:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:02 | 48:54 | 04:43 +00:19 | 48:58 -00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:06 | 53:56 | 04:12 +00:54 | 53:41 +00:15 |
| Running 8 | 04:13 | 59:02 | 05:03 -00:50 | 57:53 +01:09 |
| Wall Balls | 05:22 | 01:03:15 | 05:20 +00:02 | 01:02:56 +00:19 |
| Roxzone | 05:09 | 01:13:36 | 05:20 -00:11 | 01:13:36 |
Pacing and Profile:
In terms of pacing, Marco's running 1 split was impressive, finishing 38 seconds faster than the average. However, his running segments 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8 were slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in his running endurance. On the other hand, his sled push and sled pull splits were faster than average, highlighting his strength in these areas.
In conclusion, Marco Theisen had a strong performance in the 2023 Köln Hyrox race, finishing in the top 10% of all athletes and the top 14% in his age group. To further improve his performance, he should focus on specific segments where he lost time, such as Sandbag Lunges, Run Total, and various running segments. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as strength training exercises, interval training, and form corrections, Marco can enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bayliss Matthew | 2022 London | 01:13:12 | |
| Rodríguez Miguel | 2024 Madrid | 01:14:06 | |
| Pichler Marcel | 2024 Köln | 01:13:11 | |
| Turley James | 2024 Dublin | 01:13:07 | |
| Mcdonald Calum | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:13:41 | |
| Vincent Samuel | 2023 Manchester | 01:13:28 | |
| Schönleber Rene | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:13:36 | |
| Yaxley Joe | 2024 London | 01:13:27 | |
| O'Hora Cormac | 2024 Dublin | 01:14:02 | |
| Ham Michael | 2023 Melbourne | 01:13:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Essen | 01:23:14 | |
| 2023 München | 01:18:33 | |
| 2022 Frankfurt | 01:18:00 | |
| 2023 Frankfurt | 01:12:09 | |
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:15:26 | |
| 2022 Essen | 01:35:29 | |
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:07 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | — | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
