Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Corbett John's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Corbett John's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Corbett John's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Corbett John's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:50 | 07:35 to 05:45 | 33.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:30 | 08:25 to 06:55 | 27.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:23 | 06:49 to 05:26 | 25.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:50 to 04:32 | 5.5% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 05:08 to 04:55 | 4.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:27 to 02:16 | 3.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:01 to 03:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:23 to 44:23 | 0.0% |
| Corbett John | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:30 | 00:00 | 04:50 -01:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:50 | 03:30 | 04:33 +00:17 | 04:50 -01:20 |
| Running 2 | 05:40 | 08:20 | 05:18 +00:22 | 09:23 -01:03 |
| Sled Push | 03:01 | 14:00 | 03:09 -00:08 | 14:41 -00:41 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 17:01 | 05:46 +00:00 | 17:50 -00:49 |
| Sled Pull | 04:01 | 22:47 | 05:24 -01:23 | 23:36 -00:49 |
| Running 4 | 05:48 | 26:48 | 05:45 +00:03 | 29:00 -02:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:35 | 32:36 | 05:59 +01:36 | 34:45 -02:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 40:11 | 05:57 +00:37 | 40:44 -00:33 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 46:45 | 04:58 +00:10 | 46:41 +00:04 |
| Running 6 | 06:15 | 51:53 | 05:48 +00:27 | 51:39 +00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:27 | 58:08 | 02:22 +00:05 | 57:27 +00:41 |
| Running 7 | 06:14 | 01:00:35 | 05:46 +00:28 | 59:49 +00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:49 | 01:06:49 | 05:37 +01:12 | 01:05:35 +01:14 |
| Running 8 | 04:40 | 01:13:38 | 06:34 -01:54 | 01:11:12 +02:26 |
| Wall Balls | 08:25 | 01:18:18 | 07:16 +01:09 | 01:17:46 +00:32 |
| Roxzone | 06:15 | 01:32:49 | 07:47 -01:32 | 01:32:49 |
John Corbett's overall performance in the 2024 Dublin HYROX race was noteworthy. He finished in the top 47% of all athletes and in the top 45% of his age group. His total running time was 01:36 faster than the average, showcasing his strength in running segments. He maintained a commendable pace throughout the race with his best running lap at 00:04:40. However, he started the race faster than the average but slowed down in the subsequent running segments. John seems to have a stronger running profile and could potentially improve his strength segments to achieve a more balanced, hybrid profile.
Upon analysis of John's performance, there are several areas where improvements can be made:
Based on John's performance, the following strategies could be beneficial for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Janßen Henning | 2024 Hamburg | 01:32:51 | |
| Taxy Guillaume | 2024 Malaga | 01:32:59 | |
| Harrison Steve | 2023 Glasgow | 01:32:35 | |
| Töppich Marcus | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:32:44 | |
| Swildens Sinyo | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:32:43 | |
| Laird Kyle | 2021 Dallas | 01:33:02 | |
| Geason Albert | 2022 Dallas | 01:33:16 | |
| Petersen Michael | 2024 London | 01:33:12 | |
| Zanotti Mattia | 2023 Rimini | 01:32:54 | |
| Perez Ramon | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:33:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
