Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
03:55.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Philip Brommer showed an impressive performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 622, placing him in the top 19% of participants. Within his age group of 25-29 years, he ranked 137th, illustrating his competitive edge. His overall finishing time was 01:18:40. Notably, Philip's total running time was 00:41:16, which was slightly slower than average by 01:12, indicating his running might need more focus. His best running lap was 00:04:54. His initial running segment was significantly faster than average, suggesting he started strong but might have fatigued in later stages. The Roxzone time was slower than average, pointing towards potential improvement in transition efficiency. Overall, Philip has a balanced profile with slightly stronger strength elements, as evidenced by faster times in strength-focused exercises like the Burpees Broad Jump and Sled Push.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time: Philip's total running time was slower than average. To improve, he should focus on endurance and speed training. Specific exercises include interval training, tempo runs, and long-distance runs to build stamina and speed.
Roxzone: The time spent in the Roxzone was slower than average. Enhancing transition efficiency through practice can help. Drills like quick transitions between exercises, time-bound circuit training, and focus on maintaining a consistent pace between zones will be beneficial.
Wall Balls: Although slightly faster than average, improving technique can yield better results. Focus on squatting depth, explosive power from the legs, and accuracy in the throw. Incorporating medicine ball exercises and plyometrics can help.
Sandbag Lunges: Small improvements can be made by focusing on core stability and lunge form. Exercises such as weighted lunges, core strengthening routines, and balance drills should be included in the training regime.
Race Strategies
Start Steady: Avoid starting too fast as seen in the initial segment. Aim for a consistent pace throughout the race to prevent early fatigue.
Focus on Transitions: Practice quick transitions between exercises to minimize Roxzone time. Using visual cues and mental preparedness can improve efficiency.
Compromised Running: After strength exercises, practice running to simulate race conditions and improve performance under fatigue.
Pacing Strategy: Implement a pacing strategy that balances speed and endurance, particularly in the middle segments, to maintain energy for the final push.