Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Hong Kong using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Meyer Phillip's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Meyer Phillip's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Meyer Phillip's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Meyer Phillip's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:59 | 49:50 to 44:51 | 81.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:33 | 06:18 to 05:45 | 8.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:17 | 04:49 to 04:32 | 4.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:28 to 02:16 | 3.3% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:03 to 04:55 | 2.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:02 to 03:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:33 to 05:33 | 0.0% |
| Meyer Phillip | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 04:51 +00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 05:29 | 04:33 +00:16 | 04:51 +00:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:41 | 10:18 | 05:18 +00:23 | 09:24 +00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:07 | 15:59 | 03:09 -01:02 | 14:42 +01:17 |
| Running 3 | 06:22 | 18:06 | 05:46 +00:36 | 17:51 +00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 03:02 | 24:28 | 05:24 -02:22 | 23:37 +00:51 |
| Running 4 | 06:27 | 27:30 | 05:45 +00:42 | 29:01 -01:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:18 | 33:57 | 06:00 +00:18 | 34:46 -00:49 |
| Running 5 | 06:33 | 40:15 | 05:57 +00:36 | 40:46 -00:31 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 46:48 | 04:58 +00:05 | 46:43 +00:05 |
| Running 6 | 06:31 | 51:51 | 05:48 +00:43 | 51:41 +00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 58:22 | 02:21 +00:07 | 57:29 +00:53 |
| Running 7 | 06:16 | 01:00:50 | 05:46 +00:30 | 59:50 +01:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:22 | 01:07:06 | 05:37 -01:15 | 01:05:36 +01:30 |
| Running 8 | 06:36 | 01:11:28 | 06:34 +00:02 | 01:11:13 +00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 05:33 | 01:18:04 | 07:15 -01:42 | 01:17:47 +00:17 |
| Roxzone | 09:21 | 01:32:48 | 07:46 +01:35 | 01:32:48 |
Phillip's best running lap was 00:05:29, indicating that he has good potential in running. However, his splits analysis reveals that he struggled in several segments, including Running 1, Running 6, Running 4, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Running 3, Running 7, Running 2, and Ski Erg.
- Transitions: To improve his Roxzone time, Phillip should work on improving his overall fitness and his transition time between exercise zones. Incorporating high-intensity interval training and specific drills that simulate the transitions between exercises can help improve his performance in this area.
- Strength vs. Running: Based on Phillip's total running time being 05:38 slower than average, he should focus on incorporating more running-specific training into his routine. This can include longer runs, interval training, and tempo runs to improve his running performance.
Overall, Phillip Meyer has shown potential in running but needs to focus on improving his performance in specific segments. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Phillip can enhance his overall performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dupre Christophe | 2024 Marseille | 01:32:20 | |
| Lee John | 2023 Singapore | 01:33:12 | |
| Taxy Guillaume | 2024 Malaga | 01:32:59 | |
| Kine Didier | 2024 Marseille | 01:33:07 | |
| Poletti Stefano | 2024 Rimini | 01:32:36 | |
| Ivanov Mario | 2018 Wien | 01:33:00 | |
| Guglielmotti Manfredi | 2024 Turin | 01:32:34 | |
| Stonestreet Dean | 2024 Madrid | 01:33:14 | |
| Fletcher Ash | 2024 Madrid | 01:32:25 | |
| Klimek Jan | 2024 Katowice | 01:32:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
