Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hallam Owen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hallam Owen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hallam Owen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hallam Owen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:47 | 08:00 to 06:13 | 42.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:31 | 07:28 to 05:57 | 35.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:36 | 08:41 to 08:05 | 14.1% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 05:25 to 05:09 | 6.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:04 | 06:46 to 06:42 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:44 to 04:43 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:21 to 03:21 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:57 to 46:57 | 0.0% |
| Hallam Owen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:08 | 00:00 | 05:11 -00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 05:08 | 04:41 +00:03 | 05:11 -00:03 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 09:52 | 05:41 -00:31 | 09:52 +00:00 |
| Sled Push | 03:21 | 15:02 | 03:29 -00:08 | 15:33 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 18:23 | 06:16 -01:06 | 19:02 -00:39 |
| Sled Pull | 07:28 | 23:33 | 06:04 +01:24 | 25:18 -01:45 |
| Running 4 | 05:37 | 31:01 | 06:16 -00:39 | 31:22 -00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:46 | 36:38 | 06:52 -00:06 | 37:38 -01:00 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 43:24 | 06:31 -00:53 | 44:30 -01:06 |
| Rowing | 05:25 | 49:02 | 05:11 +00:14 | 51:01 -01:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 54:27 | 06:20 -00:37 | 56:12 -01:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 01:00:10 | 02:36 -00:15 | 01:02:32 -02:22 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 01:02:31 | 06:19 -00:21 | 01:05:08 -02:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:00 | 01:08:29 | 06:24 +01:36 | 01:11:27 -02:58 |
| Running 8 | 08:36 | 01:16:29 | 07:25 +01:11 | 01:17:51 -01:22 |
| Wall Balls | 08:41 | 01:25:05 | 08:16 +00:25 | 01:25:16 -00:11 |
| Roxzone | 08:50 | 01:42:29 | 08:57 -00:07 | 01:42:29 |
Owen Hallam demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX event, finishing in the top 52% of all athletes and top 54% within his age group. His overall time was 01:42:29, and he showcased a strong runner profile, with a total running time of 00:46:57, which was 03:19 faster than the average. Notably, his running segments, particularly Running 2, 3, and 5, were significantly faster than average, indicating a strong running capability. However, Owen started the race with a slightly slower pace in Running 1, suggesting a conservative start that may have helped him maintain a consistent performance throughout the race. His overall fitness and transition times in the roxzone were slightly better than average, indicating good endurance and strategic pacing.
By focusing on these areas of improvement and employing effective race strategies, Owen Hallam can enhance his performance in future HYROX events and continue to excel as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pradas Pozas David | 2023 Malaga | 01:42:33 | |
| Perico Nicola | 2024 Turin | 01:42:44 | |
| Latz Karsten | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:42:30 | |
| Van Der Wal Matthijs | 2024 Maastricht | 01:42:13 | |
| Pearce Michael | 2022 Birmingham | 01:42:31 | |
| Renard Frederick | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:42:25 | |
| Lim Kenneth | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:42:33 | |
| Ouarghi Yousef | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:42:42 | |
| Larose Jocelyn | 2024 Paris | 01:42:47 | |
| Martín Bernal Angel Luis | 2021 Madrid | 01:42:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
