Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Crisp Charlie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Crisp Charlie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Crisp Charlie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Crisp Charlie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:50 | 08:07 to 06:17 | 41.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:58 | 05:57 to 04:59 | 22.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:50 | 05:37 to 04:47 | 18.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:38 | 05:50 to 05:12 | 14.4% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:55 to 04:47 | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:05 to 42:05 | 0.0% |
| Crisp Charlie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:23 | 00:00 | 04:41 +00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 05:23 | 04:29 -00:04 | 04:41 +00:42 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 09:48 | 05:03 +00:04 | 09:10 +00:38 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 14:55 | 02:59 -00:34 | 14:13 +00:42 |
| Running 3 | 04:57 | 17:20 | 05:30 -00:33 | 17:12 +00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 05:37 | 22:17 | 05:03 +00:34 | 22:42 -00:25 |
| Running 4 | 05:27 | 27:54 | 05:29 -00:02 | 27:45 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:50 | 33:21 | 05:31 +00:19 | 33:14 +00:07 |
| Running 5 | 05:08 | 39:11 | 05:41 -00:33 | 38:45 +00:26 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 44:19 | 04:52 +00:03 | 44:26 -00:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 49:14 | 05:31 -00:21 | 49:18 -00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 54:24 | 02:13 -00:23 | 54:49 -00:25 |
| Running 7 | 05:08 | 56:14 | 05:30 -00:22 | 57:02 -00:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:57 | 01:01:22 | 05:16 +00:41 | 01:02:32 -01:10 |
| Running 8 | 05:48 | 01:07:19 | 06:09 -00:21 | 01:07:48 -00:29 |
| Wall Balls | 08:07 | 01:13:07 | 06:45 +01:22 | 01:13:57 -00:50 |
| Roxzone | 06:36 | 01:27:44 | 07:02 -00:26 | 01:27:44 |
Charlie Crisp delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing in the top 38% overall. His total running time of 42:05 was notably faster than the average by 1:51, indicating a strong runner profile. This suggests an inclination towards running as a strength, with room for improvement in strength-based segments. His initial running pace was slower, suggesting a conservative start, but he gained momentum in subsequent laps. His transitions through the Roxzone were efficient, slightly faster than average, which is a positive aspect of his race strategy.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomson Adam | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:42 | |
| Busico Gabriele | 2023 Milan | 01:27:23 | |
| Medway Steven | 2024 London | 01:27:41 | |
| Janney Matthew | 2023 Stockholm | 01:28:05 | |
| Snyder Keith | 2022 New York | 01:27:37 | |
| Gillespie Alex | 2023 London | 01:27:45 | |
| Holmes Gareth | 2024 London | 01:27:31 | |
| Keegan Ronan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:23 | |
| Rueda Espaa Jacobo | 2023 Malaga | 01:27:51 | |
| Gardner Sam | 2024 London | 01:27:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
