Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Singapore using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bishop Tommy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bishop Tommy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bishop Tommy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bishop Tommy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:09 | 52:12 to 45:03 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:36 to 05:36 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:31 to 06:31 | 0.0% |
| Bishop Tommy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:15 | 00:00 | 04:52 -00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 04:15 | 04:33 -00:08 | 04:52 -00:37 |
| Running 2 | 08:07 | 08:40 | 05:20 +02:47 | 09:25 -00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 16:47 | 03:09 -00:41 | 14:45 +02:02 |
| Running 3 | 08:44 | 19:15 | 05:47 +02:57 | 17:54 +01:21 |
| Sled Pull | 04:42 | 27:59 | 05:26 -00:44 | 23:41 +04:18 |
| Running 4 | 07:42 | 32:41 | 05:48 +01:54 | 29:07 +03:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:36 | 40:23 | 06:04 -00:28 | 34:55 +05:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 45:59 | 06:00 -00:12 | 40:59 +05:00 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 51:47 | 04:58 -00:18 | 46:59 +04:48 |
| Running 6 | 05:38 | 56:27 | 05:50 -00:12 | 51:57 +04:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 01:02:05 | 02:21 -00:32 | 57:47 +04:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 01:03:54 | 05:48 -00:17 | 01:00:08 +03:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:06 | 01:09:25 | 05:40 -00:34 | 01:05:56 +03:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:31 | 01:14:31 | 06:36 -00:05 | 01:11:36 +02:55 |
| Wall Balls | 06:31 | 01:21:02 | 07:22 -00:51 | 01:18:12 +02:50 |
| Roxzone | 06:02 | 01:33:25 | 07:51 -01:49 | 01:33:25 |
Tommy Bishop delivered a commendable performance, securing a rank in the top 27% overall and the top 28% within his age group. His overall time was 01:33:25. Notably, his Roxzone transitions were highly efficient, and his strength-based segments, such as the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry, showed significant strength and skill. However, his total running time was 05:45 slower than the average, indicating a potential focus area. Analyzing the pacing reveals that Tommy started strong but faced challenges in maintaining this pace, particularly in the middle segments. The data suggests a hybrid profile with a stronger inclination towards strength and compromised running endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ang Kai | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:33:12 | |
| Corrigan Jack | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:33:21 | |
| Vyse Kev | 2023 Birmingham | 01:33:20 | |
| Wood Joe | 2024 London | 01:33:02 | |
| Bermudez Christopher | 2024 Anaheim | 01:32:58 | |
| Esskandari Manzur | 2018 Hamburg | 01:33:20 | |
| Kenter Henk | 2024 Maastricht | 01:33:16 | |
| Achteresch Kai | 2023 Köln | 01:33:33 | |
| Payne Darren | 2022 London | 01:33:28 | |
| Mak Chun Yip | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:33:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
