Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 395 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Goucke Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Goucke Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Goucke Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Goucke Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:31 | 59:22 to 54:51 | 86.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:23 | 08:29 to 08:06 | 7.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 03:20 to 03:01 | 6.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:11 to 06:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 07:03 to 07:03 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:18 to 08:18 | 0.0% |
| Goucke Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:38 | 00:00 | 05:34 +01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 06:38 | 04:54 -00:17 | 05:34 +01:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:57 | 11:15 | 06:20 -00:23 | 10:28 +00:47 |
| Sled Push | 03:48 | 17:12 | 04:01 -00:13 | 16:48 +00:24 |
| Running 3 | 06:50 | 21:00 | 07:14 -00:24 | 20:49 +00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 06:11 | 27:50 | 07:08 -00:57 | 28:03 -00:13 |
| Running 4 | 07:00 | 34:01 | 07:13 -00:13 | 35:11 -01:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:29 | 41:01 | 08:19 +00:10 | 42:24 -01:23 |
| Running 5 | 06:50 | 49:30 | 07:42 -00:52 | 50:43 -01:13 |
| Rowing | 05:24 | 56:20 | 05:31 -00:07 | 58:25 -02:05 |
| Running 6 | 06:40 | 01:01:44 | 07:16 -00:36 | 01:03:56 -02:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:20 | 01:08:24 | 02:56 +00:24 | 01:11:12 -02:48 |
| Running 7 | 06:57 | 01:11:44 | 07:19 -00:22 | 01:14:08 -02:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:03 | 01:18:41 | 07:47 -00:44 | 01:21:27 -02:46 |
| Running 8 | 12:35 | 01:25:44 | 09:21 +03:14 | 01:29:14 -03:30 |
| Wall Balls | 08:18 | 01:38:19 | 09:56 -01:38 | 01:38:35 -00:16 |
| Roxzone | 13:15 | 01:59:42 | 11:11 +02:04 | 01:59:42 |
Tom Goucke's performance in the 2024 Perth HYROX event shows a strong foundation with room for targeted improvements. His overall rank places him in the top 65% of athletes, and within his age group, he is in the top 66%. Notably, Tom's total running time was 59:22, which is slightly slower than the average, suggesting that his strength lies in the hybrid nature of the event rather than in pure running. His pacing strategy suggests a strong start with a decline in speed towards the end, particularly evident in his final running segment, which was significantly slower than average. Tom shows potential in strength-based exercises such as the Ski Erg and Sled Pull, indicating a balance between running and strength.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hudson Justin | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:59:42 | |
| Gruijters Tim | 2023 Rotterdam | 02:00:05 | |
| Rose Sean | 2023 Melbourne | 01:59:13 | |
| Chico Diaz Jorge | 2022 Madrid | 02:00:00 | |
| Mohr Emanuel | 2019 Hamburg | 01:59:25 | |
| Lee Jarell | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:59:54 | |
| Meyer Marco | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:59:51 | |
| Bolton Michael | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:59:44 | |
| Goller Michael | 2019 Leipzig | 02:00:10 | |
| Latchem Martin | 2024 Birmingham | 01:59:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
