Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 379 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dittmann Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dittmann Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dittmann Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dittmann Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 07:52 | 17:44 to 09:52 | 79.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:02 | 09:08 to 08:06 | 10.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:26 | 07:28 to 07:02 | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 05:16 to 04:57 | 3.2% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 05:44 to 05:29 | 2.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 07:11 to 07:11 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 51:37 to 51:37 | 0.0% |
| Dittmann Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:06 | 00:00 | 05:35 -00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:16 | 05:06 | 04:54 +00:22 | 05:35 -00:29 |
| Running 2 | 05:40 | 10:22 | 06:20 -00:40 | 10:29 -00:07 |
| Sled Push | 03:45 | 16:02 | 04:00 -00:15 | 16:49 -00:47 |
| Running 3 | 06:50 | 19:47 | 07:12 -00:22 | 20:49 -01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 07:28 | 26:37 | 07:08 +00:20 | 28:01 -01:24 |
| Running 4 | 06:40 | 34:05 | 07:12 -00:32 | 35:09 -01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:08 | 40:45 | 08:23 +00:45 | 42:21 -01:36 |
| Running 5 | 06:50 | 49:53 | 07:41 -00:51 | 50:44 -00:51 |
| Rowing | 05:44 | 56:43 | 05:32 +00:12 | 58:25 -01:42 |
| Running 6 | 06:26 | 01:02:27 | 07:14 -00:48 | 01:03:57 -01:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 01:08:53 | 02:55 -00:55 | 01:11:11 -02:18 |
| Running 7 | 06:24 | 01:10:53 | 07:19 -00:55 | 01:14:06 -03:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:11 | 01:17:17 | 07:51 -00:40 | 01:21:25 -04:08 |
| Running 8 | 07:45 | 01:24:28 | 09:18 -01:33 | 01:29:16 -04:48 |
| Wall Balls | 17:44 | 01:32:13 | 09:58 +07:46 | 01:38:34 -06:21 |
| Roxzone | 09:59 | 01:59:46 | 11:14 -01:15 | 01:59:46 |
One of Daniel's strengths was his total running time, which was 00:51:37. This was 04:25 faster than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he has a good running profile and should continue to focus on his strength in this area. His best running lap was 00:05:06, which was 00:11 faster than average.
Additionally, Daniel should practice transitions between the exercise zones to minimize time spent in the roxzone. Improving his overall fitness and working on his transition time will help him reduce the time lost in this segment.
Overall, Daniel's performance in the Hamburg Hyrox race was commendable. By focusing on the identified areas of improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Roman David | 2022 New York | 01:59:18 | |
| Mcseveney Stevie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:59:23 | |
| Wickert Ralf | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:59:52 | |
| Saleh Abdullah | 2022 Los Angeles | 02:00:06 | |
| Lara Fred | 2024 Anaheim | 01:59:38 | |
| Heath Carl | 2022 London | 01:59:46 | |
| Gonzalez Miguel | 2023 Chicago | 02:00:16 | |
| Barridge Terry | 2024 Melbourne | 01:59:21 | |
| Guerrero Sala David | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:59:43 | |
| Wong Kenneth | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:59:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
