Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 783 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Raw Jemma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Raw Jemma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Raw Jemma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Raw Jemma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:54 | 06:36 to 05:42 | 45.8% |
| Run Total | 00:29 | 50:32 to 50:03 | 24.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 | 02:50 to 02:25 | 21.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 05:23 to 05:18 | 4.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 03:06 to 03:01 | 4.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:39 to 05:39 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:10 to 06:10 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Raw Jemma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:05 | 00:00 | 05:29 +01:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:23 | 07:05 | 05:20 +00:03 | 05:29 +01:36 |
| Running 2 | 06:00 | 12:28 | 06:01 -00:01 | 10:49 +01:39 |
| Sled Push | 03:06 | 18:28 | 03:06 +00:00 | 16:50 +01:38 |
| Running 3 | 06:09 | 21:34 | 06:24 -00:15 | 19:56 +01:38 |
| Sled Pull | 05:39 | 27:43 | 06:33 -00:54 | 26:20 +01:23 |
| Running 4 | 06:07 | 33:22 | 06:26 -00:19 | 32:53 +00:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:10 | 39:29 | 07:16 -01:06 | 39:19 +00:10 |
| Running 5 | 06:06 | 45:39 | 06:36 -00:30 | 46:35 -00:56 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 51:45 | 05:39 -00:13 | 53:11 -01:26 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 57:11 | 06:29 -00:22 | 58:50 -01:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:50 | 01:03:18 | 02:30 +00:20 | 01:05:19 -02:01 |
| Running 7 | 06:14 | 01:06:08 | 06:28 -00:14 | 01:07:49 -01:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:44 | 01:12:22 | 05:36 -00:52 | 01:14:17 -01:55 |
| Running 8 | 06:47 | 01:17:06 | 07:10 -00:23 | 01:19:53 -02:47 |
| Wall Balls | 06:36 | 01:23:53 | 05:52 +00:44 | 01:27:03 -03:10 |
| Roxzone | 10:43 | 01:41:05 | 08:10 +02:33 | 01:41:05 |
Jemma Raw showed an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. Ranked in the top 22% of all athletes, and her age group, she demonstrated a balanced strength and running profile. Her total running time was faster than average by 01:06, suggesting her running efficiency. However, Jemma's initial pace, as indicated by the first running segment, was slower than average. This suggests a potentially cautious start but she managed to pick up speed in the subsequent running segments, outpacing the average by the end of the race.
For future races, Jemma should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wagner Alina | 2022 Hamburg | 01:41:09 | |
| Rubeor Amity | 2024 New York | 01:41:10 | |
| Eskildsen Janne | 2024 Malaga | 01:40:57 | |
| Kucharski Romina | 2023 Hamburg | 01:41:21 | |
| Leijendekker Thomaske | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:40:49 | |
| Boyle Louise | 2024 Malaga | 01:41:27 | |
| Nicklow Mary Ann | 2024 New York | 01:41:25 | |
| Carthy Claire | 2023 Dublin | 01:40:58 | |
| Perez Kelly | 2024 Dallas | 01:41:33 | |
| Dowse Ellen | 2024 Melbourne | 01:41:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
