Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Weber Ben's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Weber Ben's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Weber Ben's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Weber Ben's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:23 | 10:23 to 08:00 | 51.6% |
| Run Total | 02:14 | 50:47 to 48:33 | 48.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:32 to 06:32 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:54 to 05:54 | 0.0% |
| Weber Ben | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:18 | 00:00 | 05:08 +01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 06:18 | 04:40 -00:26 | 05:08 +01:10 |
| Running 2 | 06:28 | 10:32 | 05:41 +00:47 | 09:48 +00:44 |
| Sled Push | 02:36 | 17:00 | 03:30 -00:54 | 15:29 +01:31 |
| Running 3 | 06:08 | 19:36 | 06:14 -00:06 | 18:59 +00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 04:51 | 25:44 | 05:59 -01:08 | 25:13 +00:31 |
| Running 4 | 06:00 | 30:35 | 06:15 -00:15 | 31:12 -00:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:32 | 36:35 | 06:42 -00:10 | 37:27 -00:52 |
| Running 5 | 06:10 | 43:07 | 06:29 -00:19 | 44:09 -01:02 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 49:17 | 05:10 -00:10 | 50:38 -01:21 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 54:17 | 06:17 -00:34 | 55:48 -01:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 01:00:00 | 02:33 -00:35 | 01:02:05 -02:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:18 | 01:01:58 | 06:17 -00:59 | 01:04:38 -02:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:54 | 01:07:16 | 06:15 -00:21 | 01:10:55 -03:39 |
| Running 8 | 08:45 | 01:13:10 | 07:25 +01:20 | 01:17:10 -04:00 |
| Wall Balls | 10:23 | 01:21:55 | 08:11 +02:12 | 01:24:35 -02:40 |
| Roxzone | 09:24 | 01:41:36 | 08:50 +00:34 | 01:41:36 |
Ben Weber's performance at the 2024 Poznan HYROX Race demonstrates a balance of strength and endurance, with some areas that could benefit from focused training. Notably, Ben's total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting room for improvement in his running proficiency. Conversely, his strength-based performance shone, as seen in segments like Ski Erg and Sled Push, where he finished faster than average. Analyzing the first four running segments, it is evident that Ben started slower, but gradually improved his pace, indicating a potential initial pacing issue. While his strength performance is commendable, overall fitness and running could be areas of focus to improve his overall rank.
Implementing the following strategies could lead to an improved race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Morsink Daan | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:41:43 | |
| Schrijver Pieter | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:41:33 | |
| Fecke Andreas | 2018 Hamburg | 01:41:52 | |
| Carter Samuel | 2023 Melbourne | 01:41:31 | |
| Arroyo Vargas Javier | 2024 Mexico City | 01:41:19 | |
| Jiayuan Tan Vince | 2023 Singapore | 01:41:58 | |
| Van Asselt Pim | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:41:57 | |
| Richards Stephen | 2024 Dublin | 01:41:46 | |
| Lambie Jason | 2024 Birmingham | 01:41:53 | |
| Jones Ben | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:42:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
