Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Newnham Zane's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Newnham Zane's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Newnham Zane's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Newnham Zane's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:45 | 54:52 to 49:07 | 92.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:28 | 03:59 to 03:31 | 7.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:24 to 05:24 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:38 to 06:38 | 0.0% |
| Newnham Zane | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:38 | 00:00 | 05:12 +00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 05:38 | 04:42 -00:26 | 05:12 +00:26 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 09:54 | 05:43 -00:31 | 09:54 +00:00 |
| Sled Push | 03:59 | 15:06 | 03:30 +00:29 | 15:37 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 08:13 | 19:05 | 06:18 +01:55 | 19:07 -00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 05:24 | 27:18 | 06:04 -00:40 | 25:25 +01:53 |
| Running 4 | 07:01 | 32:42 | 06:18 +00:43 | 31:29 +01:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:35 | 39:43 | 06:55 -02:20 | 37:47 +01:56 |
| Running 5 | 06:54 | 44:18 | 06:33 +00:21 | 44:42 -00:24 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 51:12 | 05:12 -00:29 | 51:15 -00:03 |
| Running 6 | 06:22 | 55:55 | 06:21 +00:01 | 56:27 -00:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 01:02:17 | 02:36 -00:12 | 01:02:48 -00:31 |
| Running 7 | 06:01 | 01:04:41 | 06:20 -00:19 | 01:05:24 -00:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:32 | 01:10:42 | 06:25 -01:53 | 01:11:44 -01:02 |
| Running 8 | 09:33 | 01:15:14 | 07:32 +02:01 | 01:18:09 -02:55 |
| Wall Balls | 06:38 | 01:24:47 | 08:25 -01:47 | 01:25:41 -00:54 |
| Roxzone | 11:50 | 01:43:10 | 09:04 +02:46 | 01:43:10 |
Zane Newnham performed well in the Hyrox race, finishing in the top 60% of athletes and achieving a respectable overall rank of 808 out of 1331 participants. In his age group (25-29), he placed in the top 62% with a rank of 124 out of 199 athletes. Zane's overall time for the race was 01:43:10, with a total running time of 00:54:52. His total running time was 06:17 slower than the average.
Zane's best running lap was 00:05:12, indicating that he had a strong segment during the race. However, when comparing his splits to the average, it is clear that there are areas for improvement.
Overall, Zane Newnham showed promising performance in the Hyrox race. By focusing on areas of improvement such as overall fitness, running endurance, and pacing, he can enhance his performance in future races. Incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, and drills tailored to target these areas will help him achieve his goals and improve his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dwyer Alexander | 2021 Los Angeles | 01:42:42 | |
| Van Den Boogert Derk Jan | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:43:16 | |
| Shuard Phil | 2022 Birmingham | 01:43:27 | |
| Jank Markus | 2022 Wien | 01:43:27 | |
| Bautista Adan | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:42:46 | |
| Goodacre Sam | 2023 Manchester | 01:42:47 | |
| Dryburgh Niall | 2023 Dublin | 01:43:08 | |
| Flores Mario | 2023 Dallas | 01:43:35 | |
| Kovar Ondrej | 2021 Hamburg | 01:43:17 | |
| Alwes Birk | 2024 Hamburg | 01:43:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:30:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
