Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Gdansk using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Klimek Jan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Klimek Jan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Klimek Jan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Klimek Jan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:31 | 08:33 to 07:02 | 37.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:49 | 03:54 to 03:05 | 20.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:48 | 06:05 to 05:17 | 19.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:38 | 06:08 to 05:30 | 15.6% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 05:15 to 04:57 | 7.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:19 to 05:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:55 to 44:55 | 0.0% |
| Klimek Jan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:33 | 00:00 | 04:53 -01:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 03:33 | 04:33 -00:13 | 04:53 -01:20 |
| Running 2 | 05:19 | 07:53 | 05:20 -00:01 | 09:26 -01:33 |
| Sled Push | 03:54 | 13:12 | 03:12 +00:42 | 14:46 -01:34 |
| Running 3 | 06:02 | 17:06 | 05:50 +00:12 | 17:58 -00:52 |
| Sled Pull | 06:05 | 23:08 | 05:29 +00:36 | 23:48 -00:40 |
| Running 4 | 05:46 | 29:13 | 05:50 -00:04 | 29:17 -00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:19 | 34:59 | 06:07 -00:48 | 35:07 -00:08 |
| Running 5 | 06:07 | 40:18 | 06:02 +00:05 | 41:14 -00:56 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 46:25 | 05:00 +00:15 | 47:16 -00:51 |
| Running 6 | 05:47 | 51:40 | 05:52 -00:05 | 52:16 -00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 57:27 | 02:23 -00:18 | 58:08 -00:41 |
| Running 7 | 05:59 | 59:32 | 05:51 +00:08 | 01:00:31 -00:59 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:08 | 01:05:31 | 05:42 +00:26 | 01:06:22 -00:51 |
| Running 8 | 06:25 | 01:11:39 | 06:40 -00:15 | 01:12:04 -00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 08:33 | 01:18:04 | 07:24 +01:09 | 01:18:44 -00:40 |
| Roxzone | 07:33 | 01:34:02 | 07:54 -00:21 | 01:34:02 |
Jan Klimek's performance in the 2024 Gdansk HYROX race places him in the top 49% of all athletes and in the top 42% of his age group, showcasing a commendable effort. Notably, his total running time was 01:52 faster than average, indicating a stronger runner profile. However, this advantage in running was somewhat offset by his performance in strength-based segments, suggesting room for a more balanced training approach. Jan's initial running segments were significantly faster than average, which could imply a potential issue with pacing, leading to early fatigue and affecting his strength performance in later stages.
In summary, Jan Klimek has demonstrated considerable potential in running, which he can leverage to his advantage with a more balanced approach to training that addresses his weaker segments. By focusing on specific areas for improvement and adopting strategic race and training strategies, Jan can significantly enhance his overall performance in future HYROX events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Galavotti Franco | 2024 Milan | 01:34:18 | |
| Böhnert Markus | 2023 Hannover | 01:33:41 | |
| Strada Alessandro | 2023 Milan | 01:34:12 | |
| Smela Norbert | 2024 Poznan | 01:34:16 | |
| Kiddell Jack | 2023 Sydney | 01:33:36 | |
| Charlie Pepe | 2024 Sydney | 01:34:24 | |
| Rowlands Garin | 2022 London | 01:33:42 | |
| Atlan James | 2023 Paris | 01:34:24 | |
| Steward Ryan | 2023 Dublin | 01:34:17 | |
| Contessa Michele | 2024 Rimini | 01:34:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Katowice | 01:32:27 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
