Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kibbler Chris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kibbler Chris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kibbler Chris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kibbler Chris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:40 | 08:43 to 06:03 | 62.3% |
| Sled Pull | 01:01 | 06:27 to 05:26 | 23.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:27 | 02:49 to 02:22 | 10.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:43 to 04:35 | 3.1% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 05:00 to 04:59 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:02 to 03:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:09 to 07:09 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:02 to 45:02 | 0.0% |
| Kibbler Chris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:59 | 00:00 | 04:58 +01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 05:59 | 04:36 +00:07 | 04:58 +01:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:59 | 10:42 | 05:24 -00:25 | 09:34 +01:08 |
| Sled Push | 03:02 | 15:41 | 03:14 -00:12 | 14:58 +00:43 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 18:43 | 05:53 -00:29 | 18:12 +00:31 |
| Sled Pull | 06:27 | 24:07 | 05:37 +00:50 | 24:05 +00:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 30:34 | 05:54 -00:25 | 29:42 +00:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:43 | 36:03 | 06:20 +02:23 | 35:36 +00:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 44:46 | 06:08 -00:27 | 41:56 +02:50 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 50:27 | 05:03 -00:03 | 48:04 +02:23 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 55:27 | 05:56 -00:26 | 53:07 +02:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:49 | 01:00:57 | 02:26 +00:23 | 59:03 +01:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:44 | 01:03:46 | 05:55 -00:11 | 01:01:29 +02:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:22 | 01:09:30 | 05:54 -01:32 | 01:07:24 +02:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:19 | 01:13:52 | 06:48 -00:29 | 01:13:18 +00:34 |
| Wall Balls | 07:09 | 01:20:11 | 07:41 -00:32 | 01:20:06 +00:05 |
| Roxzone | 08:46 | 01:35:59 | 08:12 +00:34 | 01:35:59 |
Chris Kibbler's performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race showcased a strong running profile with a total running time of 45:02, which was 2:10 faster than the average. His best running lap was clocked at 4:59, indicating a strong running capacity. However, his performance in the roxzone was slower than average by 40 seconds, indicating possible improvements needed in transition time and overall fitness. Chris's performance seemed to be more inclined towards running, indicating that he could benefit from strength training to improve his overall race time.
Looking at the pacing, it appears that Chris started the race slightly slower than average in the first running segment but improved his pace considerably in the subsequent segments. This could indicate a strategic start or a need to work on initial pacing strategies.
Considering Chris's performance and potential areas of improvement, the following strategies could be implemented during the race:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Roberts Steve | 2024 London | 01:36:13 | |
| Veraar Jairo | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:36:08 | |
| Stevens Jake | 2024 London | 01:36:22 | |
| Gabriel Nate | 2023 London | 01:35:58 | |
| Annecchini Giorgio | 2021 London | 01:36:27 | |
| Wyly Keith | 2023 Dallas | 01:36:28 | |
| Petersen Mike | 2024 Birmingham | 01:35:42 | |
| St Aubyn James | 2023 Manchester | 01:36:27 | |
| Lee Walter | 2024 Melbourne | 01:36:10 | |
| Snellman Roger | 2024 Stockholm | 01:36:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:28:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
