Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hickey Lizzy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hickey Lizzy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hickey Lizzy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hickey Lizzy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:42 | 06:42 to 05:00 | 48.1% |
| Run Total | 01:05 | 48:22 to 47:17 | 30.7% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 05:40 to 05:25 | 7.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:12 | 05:59 to 05:47 | 5.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:23 to 02:15 | 3.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 05:15 to 05:09 | 2.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:50 to 02:46 | 1.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:40 to 05:40 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Hickey Lizzy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:49 | 00:00 | 05:19 -01:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:15 | 03:49 | 05:12 +00:03 | 05:19 -01:30 |
| Running 2 | 06:03 | 09:04 | 05:46 +00:17 | 10:31 -01:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 15:07 | 02:51 -00:01 | 16:17 -01:10 |
| Running 3 | 07:33 | 17:57 | 06:05 +01:28 | 19:08 -01:11 |
| Sled Pull | 05:59 | 25:30 | 06:05 -00:06 | 25:13 +00:17 |
| Running 4 | 06:49 | 31:29 | 06:04 +00:45 | 31:18 +00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:40 | 38:18 | 06:38 -00:58 | 37:22 +00:56 |
| Running 5 | 05:54 | 43:58 | 06:14 -00:20 | 44:00 -00:02 |
| Rowing | 05:40 | 49:52 | 05:29 +00:11 | 50:14 -00:22 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 55:32 | 06:07 -00:08 | 55:43 -00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 01:01:31 | 02:22 +00:01 | 01:01:50 -00:19 |
| Running 7 | 06:22 | 01:03:54 | 06:06 +00:16 | 01:04:12 -00:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:51 | 01:10:16 | 05:06 -00:15 | 01:10:18 -00:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:58 | 01:15:07 | 06:35 -00:37 | 01:15:24 -00:17 |
| Wall Balls | 06:42 | 01:21:05 | 05:23 +01:19 | 01:21:59 -00:54 |
| Roxzone | 07:13 | 01:34:49 | 07:27 -00:14 | 01:34:49 |
Lizzy Hickey showed a solid performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event. Her overall rank was 320, placing her in the top 22% of all athletes. The total running time was 00:48:22, which was 00:07 faster than the average, indicating an excellent running ability. Furthermore, she started the race strong, with her first running segment being 01:27 faster than the average. However, her pacing seemed to drop off in subsequent running segments, as they were slower than the average. Although Lizzy's strength segments were not as strong as her running, there were notable performances in the Sled Pull and Burpees Broad Jump, where she was faster than the average.
To improve in future races, Lizzy should focus on maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race. Starting strong is important, but conserving energy for later segments is key to a good finish. She may also need to work on her transition times between exercise zones to save precious seconds. Lastly, focusing on form during strength exercises could help improve her efficiency and speed.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Smithson Helen | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:34:47 | |
| Blyth Lynsey | 2023 Paris | 01:34:30 | |
| Markstein Carina | 2024 Berlin | 01:34:24 | |
| Delia Sophie | 2023 Wien | 01:35:04 | |
| Nortje Suane | 2024 Cape Town | 01:34:24 | |
| Bittermann Christiane | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:34:56 | |
| O Leary Janine | 2023 Valencia | 01:35:00 | |
| Tan Angela | 2024 Incheon | 01:35:17 | |
| Cooke Stephanie | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:29 | |
| Dimitrov Ivayla | 2024 Marseille | 01:34:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
