Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dunsmore Gregg's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dunsmore Gregg's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dunsmore Gregg's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dunsmore Gregg's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:04 | 36:49 to 33:45 | 54.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:50 | 06:07 to 04:17 | 32.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:26 | 04:26 to 04:00 | 7.7% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 04:30 to 04:17 | 3.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 03:34 to 03:29 | 1.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:47 to 01:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:20 to 03:20 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:20 to 01:20 | 0.0% |
| Dunsmore Gregg | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:39 | 00:00 | 03:56 +00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 04:39 | 04:10 +00:16 | 03:56 +00:43 |
| Running 2 | 04:32 | 09:05 | 04:11 +00:21 | 08:06 +00:59 |
| Sled Push | 01:47 | 13:37 | 02:25 -00:38 | 12:17 +01:20 |
| Running 3 | 04:21 | 15:24 | 04:27 -00:06 | 14:42 +00:42 |
| Sled Pull | 03:20 | 19:45 | 03:52 -00:32 | 19:09 +00:36 |
| Running 4 | 04:32 | 23:05 | 04:26 +00:06 | 23:01 +00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:26 | 27:37 | 03:51 -01:25 | 27:27 +00:10 |
| Running 5 | 04:38 | 30:03 | 04:34 +00:04 | 31:18 -01:15 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 34:41 | 04:26 +00:04 | 35:52 -01:11 |
| Running 6 | 04:32 | 39:11 | 04:29 +00:03 | 40:18 -01:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:20 | 43:43 | 01:47 -00:27 | 44:47 -01:04 |
| Running 7 | 04:20 | 45:03 | 04:28 -00:08 | 46:34 -01:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:34 | 49:23 | 03:55 -00:21 | 51:02 -01:39 |
| Running 8 | 05:18 | 52:57 | 04:46 +00:32 | 54:57 -02:00 |
| Wall Balls | 06:07 | 58:15 | 04:52 +01:15 | 59:43 -01:28 |
| Roxzone | 05:09 | 01:09:23 | 04:48 +00:21 | 01:09:23 |
However, there are certain areas where Gregg can focus on for improvement. His total running time of 00:36:49 was 02:31 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that Gregg may need to work on his overall fitness and transition time to improve his performance in the roxzone. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:04:20 suggests that he has the potential to excel in running, but may need to further develop his strength.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific exercises and drills into his training routine, Gregg Dunsmore can enhance his performance in the identified areas of improvement. With consistent training and a focus on both strength and endurance, Gregg has the potential to further excel in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bell Harry | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:09:13 | |
| Ng Darren | 2024 Singapore | 01:09:49 | |
| Fritschi Damian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:09:27 | |
| Barr Joe | 2024 Malaga | 01:09:13 | |
| Bischler Simon | 2024 Hamburg | 01:08:56 | |
| Naumann Viktor | 2022 Hamburg | 01:09:03 | |
| Dunbar Tom | 2022 Manchester | 01:09:23 | |
| Mitchell Andrew | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:09:09 | |
| Biemans Geert | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:09:12 | |
| Schirmer Michael | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:09:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:07:55 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:07:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
