Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wareing Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wareing Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wareing Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wareing Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:04 | 07:02 to 05:58 | 25.4% |
| Run Total | 01:02 | 42:21 to 41:19 | 24.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:49 | 05:24 to 04:35 | 19.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:29 | 05:15 to 04:46 | 11.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 03:04 to 02:40 | 9.5% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 04:59 to 04:43 | 6.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:30 to 04:22 | 3.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:37 to 01:37 | 0.0% |
| Wareing Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:48 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 04:48 | 04:25 +00:05 | 04:35 +00:13 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 09:18 | 04:55 -00:07 | 09:00 +00:18 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 14:06 | 02:51 +00:13 | 13:55 +00:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 17:10 | 05:21 -00:17 | 16:46 +00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 05:24 | 22:14 | 04:52 +00:32 | 22:07 +00:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 27:38 | 05:20 -00:15 | 26:59 +00:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:36 | 32:43 | 05:14 -00:38 | 32:19 +00:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 37:19 | 05:30 -00:02 | 37:33 -00:14 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 42:47 | 04:47 +00:12 | 43:03 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:11 | 47:46 | 05:21 -00:10 | 47:50 -00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:37 | 52:57 | 02:09 -00:32 | 53:11 -00:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 54:34 | 05:20 -00:09 | 55:20 -00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:15 | 59:45 | 05:02 +00:13 | 01:00:40 -00:55 |
| Running 8 | 06:49 | 01:05:00 | 05:56 +00:53 | 01:05:42 -00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 07:02 | 01:11:49 | 06:25 +00:37 | 01:11:38 +00:11 |
| Roxzone | 06:01 | 01:24:46 | 06:43 -00:42 | 01:24:46 |
Based on his splits analysis, Andrew's running performance was slightly slower than average, with a time of 00:04:48 for Running 1, which was 00:23 slower than average. His skiing erg time of 00:04:30 was also slower than average by 00:07. However, he made up time in Running 2 and Sled Push, which were both faster than average. His running splits varied throughout the race, but overall he was able to maintain a consistently faster pace than average in most segments.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on targeted training techniques, Andrew can improve his performance in future HYROX races and continue to excel in his age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wendler Ralf | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:24:38 | |
| Turner Andrew | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:24:54 | |
| Kel Egidijus | 2019 Hannover | 01:24:49 | |
| Faulkner John | 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:03 | |
| Hermeneit Reinhard | 2022 Bremen | 01:24:56 | |
| Schobermayr Anton | 2019 Wien | 01:24:50 | |
| Weber Louis | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:24:35 | |
| Bridge Dean | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:35 | |
| Herd Jordan | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:35 | |
| Carralero Pérez Eduardo | 2021 Madrid | 01:24:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Malmö | 01:32:24 | |
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:21:24 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:21:24 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:35:29 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:29:51 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:48:19 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:33:03 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
