Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ingram Kieran's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ingram Kieran's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ingram Kieran's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ingram Kieran's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:52 | 07:58 to 05:06 | 66.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:39 | 05:58 to 05:19 | 15.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:24 | 02:37 to 02:13 | 9.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 03:11 to 02:59 | 4.7% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 05:04 to 04:53 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:36 to 06:36 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:04 to 42:04 | 0.0% |
| Ingram Kieran | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 04:57 | 04:33 -00:08 | 04:47 +00:10 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 09:22 | 05:13 -00:26 | 09:20 +00:02 |
| Sled Push | 03:11 | 14:09 | 03:07 +00:04 | 14:33 -00:24 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 17:20 | 05:43 -00:28 | 17:40 -00:20 |
| Sled Pull | 07:58 | 22:35 | 05:20 +02:38 | 23:23 -00:48 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 30:33 | 05:42 -00:23 | 28:43 +01:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:56 | 35:52 | 05:54 -00:58 | 34:25 +01:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:17 | 40:48 | 05:53 -00:36 | 40:19 +00:29 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 46:05 | 04:57 +00:07 | 46:12 -00:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:21 | 51:09 | 05:43 -00:22 | 51:09 +00:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:37 | 56:30 | 02:20 +00:17 | 56:52 -00:22 |
| Running 7 | 05:06 | 59:07 | 05:42 -00:36 | 59:12 -00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:58 | 01:04:13 | 05:33 +00:25 | 01:04:54 -00:41 |
| Running 8 | 06:07 | 01:10:11 | 06:27 -00:20 | 01:10:27 -00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 06:36 | 01:16:18 | 07:09 -00:33 | 01:16:54 -00:36 |
| Roxzone | 08:53 | 01:31:38 | 07:35 +01:18 | 01:31:38 |
Based on the splits analysis, Kieran performed admirably in several segments, including Ski Erg, Sled Push, Running 2, Running 3, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Wall Balls. He consistently finished these segments faster than the average time. This indicates that Kieran has a good level of strength and endurance, which contributed to his overall performance.
Overall, Kieran Ingram has shown great potential in the HYROX race. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can further enhance his performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Russell Matthew | 2021 New York | 01:31:51 | |
| Bertani Matteo | 2022 Hamburg | 01:31:28 | |
| Boydell Declan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:31:35 | |
| Dotrimont Stellings Kevin | 2024 Maastricht | 01:31:40 | |
| Haller Joss | 2024 Turin | 01:31:24 | |
| González Martín Javier | 2024 Madrid | 01:31:14 | |
| Wolff Christian | 2023 Hannover | 01:31:42 | |
| Beevor Ian | 2023 London | 01:31:34 | |
| Clarke Anthony | 2022 London | 01:31:36 | |
| Mcginn Andrew | 2023 Singapore | 01:32:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
