Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sinka Aida's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sinka Aida's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sinka Aida's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sinka Aida's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:12 | 05:56 to 04:44 | 41.9% |
| Run Total | 00:53 | 42:29 to 41:36 | 30.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 04:22 to 04:02 | 11.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:11 to 01:56 | 8.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:06 | 03:52 to 03:46 | 3.5% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 05:09 to 05:04 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:51 to 04:50 | 0.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Sinka Aida | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 04:49 +00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 05:12 | 04:58 -00:07 | 04:49 +00:23 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 10:03 | 05:08 -00:18 | 09:47 +00:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 14:53 | 02:32 -00:18 | 14:55 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 17:07 | 05:24 -00:14 | 17:27 -00:20 |
| Sled Pull | 05:56 | 22:17 | 05:13 +00:43 | 22:51 -00:34 |
| Running 4 | 05:22 | 28:13 | 05:26 -00:04 | 28:04 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:39 | 33:35 | 05:22 -00:43 | 33:30 +00:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 38:14 | 05:32 -00:01 | 38:52 -00:38 |
| Rowing | 05:09 | 43:45 | 05:12 -00:03 | 44:24 -00:39 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 48:54 | 05:27 +00:07 | 49:36 -00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 54:28 | 02:06 +00:05 | 55:03 -00:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:26 | 56:39 | 05:25 +00:01 | 57:09 -00:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:22 | 01:02:05 | 04:19 +00:03 | 01:02:34 -00:29 |
| Running 8 | 05:27 | 01:06:27 | 05:44 -00:17 | 01:06:53 -00:26 |
| Wall Balls | 03:52 | 01:11:54 | 04:22 -00:30 | 01:12:37 -00:43 |
| Roxzone | 07:27 | 01:23:04 | 06:05 +01:22 | 01:23:04 |
When analyzing her splits, we can see that Aida Sinka excelled in certain segments. Her best running lap was completed in an impressive 00:04:50, which was 15 seconds faster than the average time. She also demonstrated strength and speed in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, where she outperformed the average time by 3 seconds and 43 seconds, respectively.
However, there were areas where Aida Sinka could make improvements. The roxzone segment took her 00:07:27, which was 01:42 slower than the average time. This suggests that she may have taken more time to rest or transition between exercises. To improve this segment, Aida should focus on improving her overall fitness and reducing her transition time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forde Anna | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:00 | |
| Abbott Charlotte | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:51 | |
| Honold Katja | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:23:27 | |
| Humphrey Terri | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:33 | |
| Diani Cecilia | 2024 Milan | 01:22:53 | |
| Mcqueen Morgaine | 2023 Melbourne | 01:23:27 | |
| Rostami Joanne | 2023 Dublin | 01:22:52 | |
| Hesketh Louisa | 2023 Manchester | 01:22:59 | |
| Pinhal Gisela | 2023 Bilbao | 01:23:27 | |
| Javadi Sarah | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
