Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Newbury Dave's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Newbury Dave's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Newbury Dave's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Newbury Dave's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:39 | 08:11 to 07:32 | 48.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 04:54 to 04:38 | 19.8% |
| Run Total | 00:12 | 47:12 to 47:00 | 14.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 05:46 to 05:36 | 12.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:30 to 02:26 | 4.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:44 to 02:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:55 to 05:55 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Newbury Dave | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:27 | 00:00 | 05:03 +01:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:54 | 06:27 | 04:38 +00:16 | 05:03 +01:24 |
| Running 2 | 05:30 | 11:21 | 05:29 +00:01 | 09:41 +01:40 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 16:51 | 03:17 -00:33 | 15:10 +01:41 |
| Running 3 | 05:42 | 19:35 | 06:01 -00:19 | 18:27 +01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 05:46 | 25:17 | 05:45 +00:01 | 24:28 +00:49 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 31:03 | 06:02 -00:23 | 30:13 +00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:55 | 36:42 | 06:30 -00:35 | 36:15 +00:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:54 | 42:37 | 06:16 -00:22 | 42:45 -00:08 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 48:31 | 05:07 -00:04 | 49:01 -00:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:47 | 53:34 | 06:05 -00:18 | 54:08 -00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 59:21 | 02:27 +00:03 | 01:00:13 -00:52 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 01:01:51 | 06:04 -00:16 | 01:02:40 -00:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:15 | 01:07:39 | 06:04 -00:49 | 01:08:44 -01:05 |
| Running 8 | 06:29 | 01:12:54 | 07:01 -00:32 | 01:14:48 -01:54 |
| Wall Balls | 08:11 | 01:19:23 | 07:51 +00:20 | 01:21:49 -02:26 |
| Roxzone | 10:37 | 01:38:03 | 08:23 +02:14 | 01:38:03 |
Dave Newbury demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, finishing in the top 51% of over 4100 athletes, and the top 53% of his age group. His overall time was 01:38:03, beating the average total running time by 00:59, with his best running lap clocking in at 00:05:30.
His proficiency in running is evident, as he consistently outperformed the average time in most running segments. This suggests that Dave has a more runner profile, excelling in endurance and speed. His pacing, though, could use some work, as he started slower than average in the first running segment but picked up momentum as the race progressed.
However, there's room for improvement in his 'Roxzone' time, which was significantly slower than average, indicating a need for improved transition speed and overall fitness. His performance in the strength-based segments, such as Wall Balls, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry, were also closer to or slower than the average, suggesting a potential area to focus on in training.
To optimize his performance in future races, Dave should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearce Andy | 2023 London | 01:38:06 | |
| Mcquaide Rob | 2023 London | 01:38:07 | |
| Deerbon Jack | 2023 Melbourne | 01:37:52 | |
| Thomas Scott | 2020 Chicago | 01:38:15 | |
| Breen Cormac | 2023 Dallas | 01:38:01 | |
| Reddick Warren | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:37:39 | |
| Warburton John | 2024 Manchester | 01:38:09 | |
| Zschunke Paul | 2023 Paris | 01:38:25 | |
| Quadt Mattias | 2023 Stockholm | 01:37:41 | |
| Gurrisi Andrew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:37:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
