Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lazenby Regan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lazenby Regan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lazenby Regan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lazenby Regan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:19 | 04:35 to 03:16 | 27.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:53 | 04:14 to 03:21 | 18.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:44 | 05:01 to 04:17 | 15.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:34 | 02:28 to 01:54 | 12.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 | 04:03 to 03:29 | 12.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:26 | 01:58 to 01:32 | 9.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:12 to 04:00 | 4.2% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:18 to 04:17 | 0.4% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 32:43 to 32:43 | 0.0% |
| Lazenby Regan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:54 | 00:00 | 03:53 +01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 04:54 | 04:09 +00:03 | 03:53 +01:01 |
| Running 2 | 03:58 | 09:06 | 04:08 -00:10 | 08:02 +01:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 13:04 | 02:23 +00:05 | 12:10 +00:54 |
| Running 3 | 04:08 | 15:32 | 04:24 -00:16 | 14:33 +00:59 |
| Sled Pull | 04:14 | 19:40 | 03:49 +00:25 | 18:57 +00:43 |
| Running 4 | 04:11 | 23:54 | 04:24 -00:13 | 22:46 +01:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:35 | 28:05 | 03:48 +00:47 | 27:10 +00:55 |
| Running 5 | 04:07 | 32:40 | 04:30 -00:23 | 30:58 +01:42 |
| Rowing | 04:18 | 36:47 | 04:25 -00:07 | 35:28 +01:19 |
| Running 6 | 04:03 | 41:05 | 04:26 -00:23 | 39:53 +01:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 45:08 | 01:46 +00:12 | 44:19 +00:49 |
| Running 7 | 04:01 | 47:06 | 04:25 -00:24 | 46:05 +01:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:03 | 51:07 | 03:53 +00:10 | 50:30 +00:37 |
| Running 8 | 03:25 | 55:10 | 04:42 -01:17 | 54:23 +00:47 |
| Wall Balls | 05:01 | 58:35 | 04:52 +00:09 | 59:05 -00:30 |
| Roxzone | 05:18 | 01:08:44 | 04:47 +00:31 | 01:08:44 |
Regan Lazenby delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Milan Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 62 out of 1371 athletes, placing him in the top 4%. Within his age group (25-29), he ranked 16th, which is within the top 6%. His overall time was 01:08:44. Notably, his total running time was 02:32 faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability, suggesting a runner profile. Regan consistently outperformed the average in most running segments, with a particularly outstanding performance in Running 8, where he was 01:21 faster than average. However, he started the race relatively slow in Running 1, indicating a cautious start.
By implementing these targeted improvements and strategies, Regan can enhance his overall performance, turning weaknesses into strengths and maximizing his potential in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuhrman Jamie | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:08:40 | |
| Corbera Charles | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:08:27 | |
| Koch Stefan | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:08:43 | |
| Platt Ben | 2024 Sydney | 01:08:22 | |
| Klose Maximilian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:09:11 | |
| Ferguson James | 2024 Birmingham | 01:08:52 | |
| Abbas Alexandre | 2024 Madrid | 01:08:56 | |
| Garcia Campos Carlos | 2023 Madrid | 01:08:58 | |
| Brain Decklynd | 2023 Glasgow | 01:08:14 | |
| Mulgrew Shane | 2023 Köln | 01:08:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
