Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 763 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Testa Fabio's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Testa Fabio's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Testa Fabio's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Testa Fabio's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 50:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 50:57 | 01:42:34 to 51:37 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:30 to 03:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:17 to 06:17 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:02 to 03:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Testa Fabio | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:00 | 00:00 | 05:24 -00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 05:00 | 04:47 -00:13 | 05:24 -00:24 |
| Running 2 | 03:27 | 09:34 | 06:01 -02:34 | 10:11 -00:37 |
| Sled Push | 03:30 | 13:01 | 03:42 -00:12 | 16:12 -03:11 |
| Running 3 | 04:00 | 16:31 | 06:42 -02:42 | 19:54 -03:23 |
| Sled Pull | 06:17 | 20:31 | 06:33 -00:16 | 26:36 -06:05 |
| Running 4 | 04:06 | 26:48 | 06:40 -02:34 | 33:09 -06:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:02 | 30:54 | 07:36 -04:34 | 39:49 -08:55 |
| Running 5 | 03:52 | 33:56 | 06:59 -03:07 | 47:25 -13:29 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 37:48 | 05:22 -00:30 | 54:24 -16:36 |
| Running 6 | 03:42 | 42:40 | 06:44 -03:02 | 59:46 -17:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 46:22 | 02:47 -00:45 | 01:06:30 -20:08 |
| Running 7 | 03:52 | 48:24 | 06:49 -02:57 | 01:09:17 -20:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:22 | 52:16 | 07:02 -02:40 | 01:16:06 -23:50 |
| Running 8 | 39:37 | 56:38 | 08:17 +31:20 | 01:23:08 -26:30 |
| Wall Balls | 04:34 | 01:36:15 | 09:11 -04:37 | 01:31:25 +04:50 |
| Roxzone | 09:54 | 01:50:37 | 10:01 -00:07 | 01:50:37 |
Based on his splits analysis, Fabio's best running lap was 00:38:27, which indicates his ability to maintain a solid pace throughout the race. However, his total running time of 01:42:34 was 50:55 slower than the average, suggesting that he may need to work on his overall fitness and transition time.
In summary, Fabio Testa displayed a strong performance in the 2022 Manchester Hyrox race. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on enhancing his overall fitness and transition time. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and mental preparation, Fabio can enhance his running performance and excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ciudad Real Roberto | 2024 Melbourne | 01:50:36 | |
| Leoni Paolo | 2024 Rimini | 01:50:12 | |
| Ho Benjamin | 2024 Brisbane | 01:50:35 | |
| Yannaros James | 2023 Birmingham | 01:50:12 | |
| Seewald Walter | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:50:19 | |
| Baylis Geoff | 2024 Manchester | 01:51:01 | |
| Schmidt Lars | 2023 Hannover | 01:50:56 | |
| Sauer Thom | 2023 Hamburg | 01:50:53 | |
| Karnes Jason | 2024 Anaheim | 01:50:34 | |
| Marcelle Nick | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:50:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:23:54 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:25:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
