Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Malaga using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Miguel Gómez Martín Antonio's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Miguel Gómez Martín Antonio's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Miguel Gómez Martín Antonio's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Miguel Gómez Martín Antonio's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:50 | 40:54 to 39:04 | 52.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:35 | 03:01 to 02:26 | 16.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 04:39 to 04:25 | 6.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 04:35 to 04:22 | 6.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:26 to 04:15 | 5.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:03 to 01:52 | 5.3% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:45 to 04:35 | 4.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:04 | 05:29 to 05:25 | 1.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Miguel Gómez Martín Antonio | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:33 | 00:00 | 04:23 +00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 04:33 | 04:21 +00:05 | 04:23 +00:10 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 08:59 | 04:42 +00:08 | 08:44 +00:15 |
| Sled Push | 03:01 | 13:49 | 02:44 +00:17 | 13:26 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:19 | 16:50 | 05:06 +00:13 | 16:10 +00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 04:02 | 22:09 | 04:33 -00:31 | 21:16 +00:53 |
| Running 4 | 05:07 | 26:11 | 05:05 +00:02 | 25:49 +00:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:39 | 31:18 | 04:50 -00:11 | 30:54 +00:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:05 | 35:57 | 05:14 -00:09 | 35:44 +00:13 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 41:02 | 04:40 +00:05 | 40:58 +00:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:11 | 45:47 | 05:06 +00:05 | 45:38 +00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 50:58 | 02:02 +00:01 | 50:44 +00:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 53:01 | 05:05 -00:01 | 52:46 +00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:35 | 58:05 | 04:41 -00:06 | 57:51 +00:14 |
| Running 8 | 05:50 | 01:02:40 | 05:33 +00:17 | 01:02:32 +00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 05:29 | 01:08:30 | 05:56 -00:27 | 01:08:05 +00:25 |
| Roxzone | 06:19 | 01:20:09 | 06:08 +00:11 | 01:20:09 |
Based on his splits analysis, Antonio's best running lap was 00:04:33. He performed slower than the average in Running 1, Ski Erg, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Burpees Broad Jump, Rowing, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8. However, he did perform faster than the average in Sled Push, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, and Sandbag Lunges.
He should also make sure to properly warm up before the race to prevent injuries and improve his performance. This can include dynamic stretches, mobility exercises, and a light jog.
Additionally, Antonio should strategize his transitions between segments to minimize time lost. Practicing quick and efficient transitions during training can help him improve his overall race time.
Overall, Antonio should continue to prioritize his running performance by incorporating interval training and hill sprints into his routine. At the same time, he should focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time to reduce the time spent in the Roxzone.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nazar Arian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:19:42 | |
| Gilbride Liam | 2023 Glasgow | 01:20:38 | |
| Thompson Rory | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:09 | |
| Bloomfield Tim | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:20:09 | |
| Hargreaves Gerard | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:22 | |
| Höhn Franz | 2024 Hamburg | 01:20:17 | |
| Johnson Ryan | 2022 Chicago | 01:20:27 | |
| Bak Aamand Søren | 2024 Malaga | 01:20:24 | |
| Miller Dakota | 2023 Dallas | 01:20:23 | |
| Villasante Moreno Urko | 2021 Madrid | 01:20:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
