Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Au Ck's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Au Ck's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Au Ck's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Au Ck's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 04:25 to 02:14 | 59.3% |
| Run Total | 00:57 | 45:25 to 44:28 | 25.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:21 | 04:52 to 04:31 | 9.5% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:06 to 04:54 | 5.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:49 to 02:49 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:38 to 05:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:06 to 06:06 | 0.0% |
| Au Ck | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:35 | 00:00 | 04:49 -00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 04:35 | 04:33 +00:19 | 04:49 -00:14 |
| Running 2 | 04:21 | 09:27 | 05:18 -00:57 | 09:22 +00:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 13:48 | 03:08 -00:19 | 14:40 -00:52 |
| Running 3 | 05:29 | 16:37 | 05:46 -00:17 | 17:48 -01:11 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 22:06 | 05:23 -00:29 | 23:34 -01:28 |
| Running 4 | 05:43 | 27:00 | 05:45 -00:02 | 28:57 -01:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:38 | 32:43 | 05:58 -00:20 | 34:42 -01:59 |
| Running 5 | 06:04 | 38:21 | 05:57 +00:07 | 40:40 -02:19 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 44:25 | 04:58 +00:08 | 46:37 -02:12 |
| Running 6 | 06:12 | 49:31 | 05:48 +00:24 | 51:35 -02:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:25 | 55:43 | 02:21 +02:04 | 57:23 -01:40 |
| Running 7 | 06:22 | 01:00:08 | 05:45 +00:37 | 59:44 +00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:06:30 | 05:35 -00:24 | 01:05:29 +01:01 |
| Running 8 | 06:44 | 01:11:41 | 06:32 +00:12 | 01:11:04 +00:37 |
| Wall Balls | 06:06 | 01:18:25 | 07:13 -01:07 | 01:17:36 +00:49 |
| Roxzone | 08:07 | 01:32:29 | 07:40 +00:27 | 01:32:29 |
Ck Au had a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking within the top 41% overall and top 40% in his age group. His total running time was 38 seconds faster than average, indicating a strong running profile, suggesting he excels in this area compared to strength-based exercises. However, his performance in the latter running segments showed signs of fatigue, which could imply an overly ambitious start. He showed exceptional speed in Running 2, ranking in the 2nd percentile, but his pace slowed significantly in Running 6 and Running 7.
This segment was significantly slower, with a time 2:04 slower than average. Improving grip strength and core stability will be key.
Training Strategies and Exercises:The transitions were slower than average by 34 seconds. Working on quick transitions and maintaining focus during these segments is essential.
Training Strategies and Exercises:Both segments were slower than average, indicating the need for enhanced cardiovascular endurance and technique.
Training Strategies and Exercises:To optimize his performance, Ck Au should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Viezenz Leonard | 2023 Hamburg | 01:32:36 | |
| Daoud Youssef | 2024 Paris | 01:32:35 | |
| Harnetty Rob | 2024 Marseille | 01:32:36 | |
| Fernandes André | 2023 Madrid | 01:32:07 | |
| Redding Brad | 2023 Houston | 01:32:51 | |
| Renero Jose | 2023 Dallas | 01:32:21 | |
| Fitters Sander | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:32:36 | |
| Jonczyk Sebastian | 2022 Leipzig | 01:32:17 | |
| Ruiz Zepeda Isaac Vadir | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:32:33 | |
| Maas Paul | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:32:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:44:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
