Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Leipzig using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schwella Eric's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schwella Eric's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schwella Eric's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schwella Eric's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:23 | 47:12 to 40:49 | 98.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:03 | 05:53 to 05:50 | 0.8% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:43 to 04:41 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:10 to 01:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:09 to 03:09 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:50 to 03:50 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:44 to 01:44 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Schwella Eric | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:49 | 00:00 | 04:31 +00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 04:49 | 04:24 -00:04 | 04:31 +00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 09:09 | 04:52 +00:39 | 08:55 +00:14 |
| Sled Push | 01:10 | 14:40 | 02:51 -01:41 | 13:47 +00:53 |
| Running 3 | 06:01 | 15:50 | 05:17 +00:44 | 16:38 -00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 03:09 | 21:51 | 04:47 -01:38 | 21:55 -00:04 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 25:00 | 05:15 +00:47 | 26:42 -01:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:50 | 31:02 | 05:05 -01:15 | 31:57 -00:55 |
| Running 5 | 06:00 | 34:52 | 05:25 +00:35 | 37:02 -02:10 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 40:52 | 04:46 -00:03 | 42:27 -01:35 |
| Running 6 | 06:04 | 45:35 | 05:17 +00:47 | 47:13 -01:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:44 | 51:39 | 02:08 -00:24 | 52:30 -00:51 |
| Running 7 | 06:02 | 53:23 | 05:16 +00:46 | 54:38 -01:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:37 | 59:25 | 04:56 -00:19 | 59:54 -00:29 |
| Running 8 | 06:46 | 01:04:02 | 05:49 +00:57 | 01:04:50 -00:48 |
| Wall Balls | 05:53 | 01:10:48 | 06:17 -00:24 | 01:10:39 +00:09 |
| Roxzone | 06:55 | 01:23:30 | 06:34 +00:21 | 01:23:30 |
However, there are areas of his race performance that can be improved upon. His total running time of 00:47:12 was 06:42 slower than the average time, indicating that he may benefit from focusing on his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his split times for the running segments were generally slower than average, with Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8 all showing slower times. His best running lap was 00:04:49, which was 00:26 slower than average.
In conclusion, Eric Schwella displayed a strong performance in the Hyrox race in Leipzig. However, there are areas that can be improved upon, particularly in his running segments and transition times. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, focusing on overall fitness, and incorporating specific exercises and drills, Eric can enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bourdereau Ju | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:23:12 | |
| Moussay Charles | 2024 Paris | 01:23:26 | |
| Meech Wayne | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:08 | |
| Gunns Matthew | 2023 Glasgow | 01:23:40 | |
| Patterson Wes | 2020 Chicago | 01:23:51 | |
| Bamieh Adib | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:23:54 | |
| Ong Han Loong | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:23:33 | |
| Sanchez Rudy | 2022 Chicago | 01:23:30 | |
| Edwards James | 2023 Birmingham | 01:23:25 | |
| Murphy Michael | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
