Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Anaheim using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Henderson Steven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Henderson Steven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Henderson Steven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Henderson Steven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:20 | 45:31 to 43:11 | 81.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:26 | 05:20 to 04:54 | 15.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:06 | 05:28 to 05:22 | 3.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:39 to 02:39 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:28 to 06:28 | 0.0% |
| Henderson Steven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:00 | 00:00 | 04:45 +01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 06:00 | 04:30 -00:06 | 04:45 +01:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:05 | 10:24 | 05:06 -00:01 | 09:15 +01:09 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 15:29 | 03:01 -00:22 | 14:21 +01:08 |
| Running 3 | 05:53 | 18:08 | 05:34 +00:19 | 17:22 +00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 05:20 | 24:01 | 05:09 +00:11 | 22:56 +01:05 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 29:21 | 05:34 +00:28 | 28:05 +01:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:28 | 35:23 | 05:41 -00:13 | 33:39 +01:44 |
| Running 5 | 05:42 | 40:51 | 05:44 -00:02 | 39:20 +01:31 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 46:33 | 04:53 -00:23 | 45:04 +01:29 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 51:03 | 05:35 +00:01 | 49:57 +01:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 56:39 | 02:16 -00:12 | 55:32 +01:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:24 | 58:43 | 05:34 -00:10 | 57:48 +00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 01:04:07 | 05:24 -00:29 | 01:03:22 +00:45 |
| Running 8 | 05:51 | 01:09:02 | 06:15 -00:24 | 01:08:46 +00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 06:28 | 01:14:53 | 06:52 -00:24 | 01:15:01 -00:08 |
| Roxzone | 07:54 | 01:29:09 | 07:16 +00:38 | 01:29:09 |
When analyzing his splits, it is evident that Steven struggled in some areas while performing well in others. His running 1 segment was 01:24 slower than the average, indicating a potential area for improvement. However, he showed strength in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, where he was faster than the average by 00:02 and 00:40, respectively. Steven's running 4 segment was 00:26 slower than average, and his Burpees Broad Jump segment was 00:11 slower than average.
Overall, Steven Henderson had a strong performance in the 2023 Anaheim HYROX race. By focusing on improving his running endurance, reducing transition time, and building upper body and core strength, he can further enhance his performance in future races. Implementing race strategies such as maintaining a consistent pace, efficient transitions, and mental preparation will also contribute to his overall success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bijl Evert | 2024 Maastricht | 01:29:00 | |
| Fleche Jerome | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:29:10 | |
| Morales Miguel | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:36 | |
| Subotic Boris | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:29:32 | |
| Lin Jinjun | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:29:06 | |
| Prahl Sebastian | 2019 Leipzig | 01:29:14 | |
| Mccleary Adam | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:21 | |
| Jarvis Carl | 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:15 | |
| Hofmann Günter | 2024 Berlin | 01:28:42 | |
| Dack Leon | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
