Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcmonagle Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcmonagle Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcmonagle Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcmonagle Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:18 | 07:08 to 05:50 | 26.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:14 | 06:02 to 04:48 | 25.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:53 | 05:22 to 04:29 | 17.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:29 | 05:09 to 04:40 | 9.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:20 | 04:40 to 04:20 | 6.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 | 02:16 to 01:59 | 5.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 02:53 to 02:37 | 5.4% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:50 to 04:41 | 3.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:05 to 40:05 | 0.0% |
| Mcmonagle Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:16 | 00:00 | 04:33 -01:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 03:16 | 04:24 +00:16 | 04:33 -01:17 |
| Running 2 | 05:13 | 07:56 | 04:52 +00:21 | 08:57 -01:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 13:09 | 02:52 +00:01 | 13:49 -00:40 |
| Running 3 | 05:19 | 16:02 | 05:18 +00:01 | 16:41 -00:39 |
| Sled Pull | 05:22 | 21:21 | 04:49 +00:33 | 21:59 -00:38 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 26:43 | 05:15 +00:14 | 26:48 -00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 32:12 | 05:07 +00:55 | 32:03 +00:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 38:14 | 05:26 +00:10 | 37:10 +01:04 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 43:50 | 04:46 +00:04 | 42:36 +01:14 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 48:40 | 05:18 +00:13 | 47:22 +01:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 54:11 | 02:08 +00:08 | 52:40 +01:31 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 56:27 | 05:17 +00:23 | 54:48 +01:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:09 | 01:02:07 | 04:57 +00:12 | 01:00:05 +02:02 |
| Running 8 | 04:05 | 01:07:16 | 05:51 -01:46 | 01:05:02 +02:14 |
| Wall Balls | 07:08 | 01:11:21 | 06:16 +00:52 | 01:10:53 +00:28 |
| Roxzone | 05:25 | 01:23:45 | 06:36 -01:11 | 01:23:45 |
Paul Mcmonagle demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Dublin Hyrox Race, ranking in the top 32% out of 2696 athletes and in the top 23% in his age group (45-49). His total run time of 00:40:05, which was 01:56 faster than the average, suggests that he excels in running compared to other exercises. Notably, his pacing during the race was well-managed as indicated by his consistent running times. However, as his Roxzone time was faster than average, this hints at the need for more efficient transitions between exercises.
During the race, Paul should focus on maintaining a consistent pace and not start too fast, as this could lead to early fatigue. He can also aim to improve his transition time between exercises to cut down on the overall race time. Furthermore, he should consider doing specific warm-ups before each strength-based exercise to ensure he is ready and can perform at his best. Lastly, practicing the actual race layout (or a similar one) can help him get used to transitioning between exercises, which could potentially improve the Roxzone time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sery Saul | 2023 Barcelona | 01:23:53 | |
| Richardson Simon | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:18 | |
| Knoth Benjamin | 2021 Hamburg | 01:23:54 | |
| Mac Criostail Pádraig | 2024 Dublin | 01:23:57 | |
| Barker Kaine | 2023 Melbourne | 01:24:14 | |
| Zandecki Artur | 2023 Warschau | 01:24:10 | |
| Scheerle Benjamin | 2019 Hannover | 01:23:23 | |
| Gambin Thomas | 2024 Marseille | 01:23:44 | |
| Van Buren David | 2024 Dublin | 01:24:11 | |
| Foley Nigel | 2024 Glasgow | 01:23:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
