Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 956 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Stott Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Stott Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Stott Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Stott Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:56 | 13:23 to 08:27 | 62.8% |
| Sled Pull | 01:36 | 07:47 to 06:11 | 20.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:58 | 07:27 to 06:29 | 12.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 07:21 to 07:00 | 4.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:19 to 03:19 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:26 to 44:26 | 0.0% |
| Stott Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:33 | 00:00 | 05:19 +00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:39 | 05:33 | 04:45 -00:06 | 05:19 +00:14 |
| Running 2 | 04:43 | 10:12 | 05:48 -01:05 | 10:04 +00:08 |
| Sled Push | 03:19 | 14:55 | 03:36 -00:17 | 15:52 -00:57 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 18:14 | 06:26 -01:28 | 19:28 -01:14 |
| Sled Pull | 07:47 | 23:12 | 06:21 +01:26 | 25:54 -02:42 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 30:59 | 06:26 -01:10 | 32:15 -01:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:21 | 36:15 | 07:14 +00:07 | 38:41 -02:26 |
| Running 5 | 05:59 | 43:36 | 06:44 -00:45 | 45:55 -02:19 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 49:35 | 05:17 -00:13 | 52:39 -03:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 54:39 | 06:29 -01:03 | 57:56 -03:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 01:00:05 | 02:40 -00:21 | 01:04:25 -04:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 01:02:24 | 06:31 -01:04 | 01:07:05 -04:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:27 | 01:07:51 | 06:44 +00:43 | 01:13:36 -05:45 |
| Running 8 | 07:08 | 01:15:18 | 07:47 -00:39 | 01:20:20 -05:02 |
| Wall Balls | 13:23 | 01:22:26 | 08:54 +04:29 | 01:28:07 -05:41 |
| Roxzone | 10:41 | 01:46:21 | 09:20 +01:21 | 01:46:21 |
Luke Stott finished in the top 58% overall and top 63% in his age group, demonstrating above-average performance. Despite a slower start in the first running segment, he managed to pick up the pace and finished convincingly strong in subsequent running segments. His total running time was faster than average, indicating that he has a runner's profile. However, his slower than average roxzone time suggests that he needs to work on his overall fitness and transition times between exercise zones.
To improve his race performance, Luke should consider the following strategies:
Overall, with focused training and strategic race planning, Luke has the potential to significantly improve his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De La Mora Salvador | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:46:31 | |
| Diaz Martinez Salvador | 2024 Mexico City | 01:46:17 | |
| Kim Edsel | 2024 Singapore | 01:45:58 | |
| Renard Andre | 2024 Dallas | 01:46:37 | |
| Daniels Jiles | 2023 Dallas | 01:45:57 | |
| Johnson Mark | 2024 Birmingham | 01:45:52 | |
| Krukkert Hans | 2022 Maastricht | 01:46:05 | |
| Cox Tanner | 2023 Chicago | 01:46:37 | |
| Kulling Ulf | 2021 Berlin | 01:46:00 | |
| Santella Nick | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:46:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:40:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
