Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 724 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gilligan Teresa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gilligan Teresa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gilligan Teresa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gilligan Teresa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:52 | 52:42 to 49:50 | 52.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 07:50 to 07:02 | 14.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:37 | 06:15 to 05:38 | 11.4% |
| Rowing | 00:23 | 05:58 to 05:35 | 7.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:21 | 03:21 to 03:00 | 6.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 05:40 to 05:22 | 5.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 05:24 to 05:18 | 1.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Gilligan Teresa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:53 | 00:00 | 05:30 +00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:24 | 05:53 | 05:19 +00:05 | 05:30 +00:23 |
| Running 2 | 06:08 | 11:17 | 05:59 +00:09 | 10:49 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 03:21 | 17:25 | 03:03 +00:18 | 16:48 +00:37 |
| Running 3 | 06:19 | 20:46 | 06:22 -00:03 | 19:51 +00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 04:28 | 27:05 | 06:28 -02:00 | 26:13 +00:52 |
| Running 4 | 06:29 | 31:33 | 06:24 +00:05 | 32:41 -01:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:50 | 38:02 | 07:13 +00:37 | 39:05 -01:03 |
| Running 5 | 06:47 | 45:52 | 06:36 +00:11 | 46:18 -00:26 |
| Rowing | 05:58 | 52:39 | 05:37 +00:21 | 52:54 -00:15 |
| Running 6 | 06:46 | 58:37 | 06:28 +00:18 | 58:31 +00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:25 | 01:05:23 | 02:27 -00:02 | 01:04:59 +00:24 |
| Running 7 | 06:45 | 01:07:48 | 06:26 +00:19 | 01:07:26 +00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:40 | 01:14:33 | 05:31 +00:09 | 01:13:52 +00:41 |
| Running 8 | 07:40 | 01:20:13 | 07:08 +00:32 | 01:19:23 +00:50 |
| Wall Balls | 06:15 | 01:27:53 | 05:46 +00:29 | 01:26:31 +01:22 |
| Roxzone | 06:28 | 01:40:28 | 08:11 -01:43 | 01:40:28 |
Based on the splits analysis, it can be observed that Teresa had slower times in several segments compared to the average. These segments include Running 1, Ski Erg, Running 2, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Rowing, Running 6, Running 7, Running 8, and Wall Balls. The segments with the most time lost were Run Total, Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, Running 1, Best Lap, Rowing, Running 8, Running 7, Running 6, Running 2, and Sandbag Lunges.
By focusing on these areas of improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies, Teresa can enhance her overall performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Knauss Claudia | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:40:10 | |
| Davies Jasmine | 2024 Stockholm | 01:40:03 | |
| Khaoui Jamila | 2023 London | 01:40:53 | |
| Park Clare | 2024 London | 01:40:14 | |
| Furey Diana | 2021 New York | 01:40:23 | |
| Jordan Heather | 2024 New York | 01:40:53 | |
| Wittrock Lilly | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:40:39 | |
| Tuckley Janice | 2023 London | 01:40:08 | |
| Mcginness Meg | 2024 Glasgow | 01:40:48 | |
| Stoklund Christel Krogh | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:40:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Dublin | 01:38:53 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
