Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 657 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:42 (From 55:12 to 52:30) | 51.6% |
| BBJ | 01:27 (From 09:02 to 07:35) | 27.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:35 (From 07:33 to 06:58) | 11.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 (From 03:07 to 02:51) | 5.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:09 (From 09:21 to 09:12) | 2.9% |
| Rowing | 00:05 (From 05:27 to 05:22) | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:29 to 04:29) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 03:21 to 03:21) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 06:23 to 06:23) | 0.0% |
| Van Ling Ivo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:25 | 00:00 | 05:33 -01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 04:25 | 04:50 -00:21 | 05:33 -01:08 |
| Running 2 | 06:03 | 08:54 | 06:05 -00:02 | 10:23 -01:29 |
| Sled Push | 03:21 | 14:57 | 03:45 -00:24 | 16:28 -01:31 |
| Running 3 | 06:22 | 18:18 | 06:49 -00:27 | 20:13 -01:55 |
| Sled Pull | 06:23 | 24:40 | 06:35 -00:12 | 27:02 -02:22 |
| Running 4 | 06:40 | 31:03 | 06:46 -00:06 | 33:37 -02:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:02 | 37:43 | 07:46 +01:16 | 40:23 -02:40 |
| Running 5 | 07:21 | 46:45 | 07:10 +00:11 | 48:09 -01:24 |
| Rowing | 05:27 | 54:06 | 05:23 +00:04 | 55:19 -01:13 |
| Running 6 | 06:36 | 59:33 | 06:51 -00:15 | 01:00:42 -01:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:07 | 01:06:09 | 02:46 +00:21 | 01:07:33 -01:24 |
| Running 7 | 07:53 | 01:09:16 | 06:54 +00:59 | 01:10:19 -01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:33 | 01:17:09 | 07:17 +00:16 | 01:17:13 -00:04 |
| Running 8 | 09:54 | 01:24:42 | 08:32 +01:22 | 01:24:30 +00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 09:21 | 01:34:36 | 09:21 +00:00 | 01:33:02 +01:34 |
| Roxzone | 08:50 | 01:52:42 | 10:19 -01:29 | 01:52:42 |
Ivo Van Ling demonstrated a solid performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race. He achieved an overall rank of 2048, placing him in the top 65% of all participants, and ranked 45th in his age group. Notably, his total running time was 00:55:12, which is 00:14 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, his running performance decreased over the course of the race, suggesting a pacing strategy that started too fast, especially evident from his first running segment being significantly faster than the average. While his running segments were strong, his performance in strength-based exercises was comparatively weaker, indicating an opportunity to improve his strength endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Boelhouwers Bas | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:53:10 | |
| Posthuma Erik | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:52:12 | |
| Bell David | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:53:11 | |
| Thiemann Torsten | 2019 Hannover | 01:53:03 | |
| Welsh Chris | 2023 Glasgow | 01:52:47 | |
| Busch Alexander | 2020 Hannover | 01:52:36 | |
| Colton Tom | 2024 Birmingham | 01:52:54 | |
| Balk Matthias | 2022 Essen | 01:52:31 | |
| Rinia Jurre | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:52:57 | |
| Fraatz Carsten | 2022 Bremen | 01:52:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam Munter Laura, Van Ling Ivo, Van Essen Pascal, Rundberg Vera | 01:14:48 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Van Ling Ivo
