Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
06:31.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Matthew Manaid performed well at the 2024 Manchester HYROX event, finishing within the top 80% of athletes in his age group. His total running time was slightly below average, indicating that he may benefit from more focused running training. However, Matthew's early running segments were strong, particularly Running 1 and Running 4 where he was significantly faster than the average competitor. This suggests he may have started the race at a high pace but struggled to maintain this throughout the event. His performance in the Roxzone was exceptional, being significantly faster than average, which implies excellent general fitness and transition speed.
Segments to Improve:
Running Sessions: Matthew's running performance varied throughout the race. He started strong but lost pace in the middle segments, particularly Running 2 and Running 3. To improve his running stamina and consistency, Matthew could incorporate interval training into his routine. This method involves alternating between high and low intensity running which can enhance endurance and speed. Additionally, tempo runs at a steady, challenging pace can help improve race pacing and metabolic fitness.
Sled Pull: Matthew's performance in the sled pull was slower than average. To enhance his strength in this area, he could incorporate more resistance training into his routine, particularly focusing on leg and core strength. Specific exercises could include deadlifts, squats, and weighted lunges.
Farmers Carry: Matthew's farmers carry time was significantly slower than average, indicating a potential weakness in grip strength and core stability. Incorporating exercises such as dumbbell farmer's walks, kettlebell swings, and plank holds can help improve these areas.
Sandbag Lunges and Wall Balls: These segments were also slower than average, suggesting a need for improved lower body strength and endurance. Weighted lunges, squats, and plyometric exercises like box jumps could help enhance performance here.
Race Strategies:
In future races, Matthew might consider adjusting his pacing strategy to conserve energy for the middle and later segments of the race. While his early speed is impressive, it seems to be affecting his performance in later stages. A more evenly paced strategy might yield better overall results. Additionally, focusing on transition efficiency could further improve his Roxzone time and overall performance. This could involve practicing quick recovery techniques and smooth transitions between different exercises during training.