Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 652 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Houssos Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Houssos Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Houssos Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Houssos Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 07:34 | 59:37 to 52:03 | 85.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:10 | 08:38 to 07:28 | 13.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:57 to 02:49 | 1.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:09 to 06:09 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Houssos Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 05:27 +00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 05:29 | 04:48 -00:25 | 05:27 +00:02 |
| Running 2 | 05:47 | 09:52 | 06:02 -00:15 | 10:15 -00:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 15:39 | 03:43 -01:37 | 16:17 -00:38 |
| Running 3 | 06:37 | 17:45 | 06:46 -00:09 | 20:00 -02:15 |
| Sled Pull | 05:25 | 24:22 | 06:35 -01:10 | 26:46 -02:24 |
| Running 4 | 06:33 | 29:47 | 06:45 -00:12 | 33:21 -03:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:38 | 36:20 | 07:40 +00:58 | 40:06 -03:46 |
| Running 5 | 08:29 | 44:58 | 07:05 +01:24 | 47:46 -02:48 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 53:27 | 05:22 -00:21 | 54:51 -01:24 |
| Running 6 | 07:42 | 58:28 | 06:52 +00:50 | 01:00:13 -01:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:57 | 01:06:10 | 02:44 +00:13 | 01:07:05 -00:55 |
| Running 7 | 08:42 | 01:09:07 | 06:49 +01:53 | 01:09:49 -00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:09 | 01:17:49 | 07:00 -00:51 | 01:16:38 +01:11 |
| Running 8 | 10:21 | 01:23:58 | 08:30 +01:51 | 01:23:38 +00:20 |
| Wall Balls | 05:25 | 01:34:19 | 09:14 -03:49 | 01:32:08 +02:11 |
| Roxzone | 12:00 | 01:51:37 | 10:15 +01:45 | 01:51:37 |
Overall, Nick Houssos demonstrated a strong performance in the strength-based segments of the race, ranking impressively high in events such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls. His overall rank placed him in the top 57% of all participants and 64% in his age group. However, his total running time was notably slower than the average by 4 minutes and 53 seconds, indicating a need for improvement in running efficiency. The pacing strategy suggests that Nick started with a moderate pace but slowed significantly in the later running segments, which might have been affected by fatigue from strength exercises.
Nick's profile leans more towards strength, as evidenced by his outstanding performance in Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Wall Balls, but he shows potential to become a more balanced athlete by improving his running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Harley Steve | 2024 Malaga | 01:51:14 | |
| Gallardo Garcia Miguel Angel | 2021 Madrid | 01:51:14 | |
| Tahi Teiva | 2024 Marseille | 01:51:54 | |
| Stiekema Rob | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:51:28 | |
| Vroom Lennard | 2019 Hannover | 01:51:44 | |
| Mclaughlin Derek | 2022 Manchester | 01:51:36 | |
| Edney Grant | 2023 London | 01:51:25 | |
| Avitia Erik | 2023 Dallas | 01:52:02 | |
| Gennaro Raffaele | 2024 Rimini | 01:51:23 | |
| Neumaier Michael | 2023 München | 01:51:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 02:01:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
