Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Malone Michael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Malone Michael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Malone Michael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Malone Michael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:02 | 07:52 to 05:50 | 47.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:37 | 05:25 to 04:48 | 14.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:34 | 03:11 to 02:37 | 13.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:33 | 02:32 to 01:59 | 12.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:28 | 05:08 to 04:40 | 11.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:01 | 04:30 to 04:29 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:55 to 39:55 | 0.0% |
| Malone Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:58 | 00:00 | 04:33 -00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:59 | 03:58 | 04:24 -00:25 | 04:33 -00:35 |
| Running 2 | 04:23 | 07:57 | 04:52 -00:29 | 08:57 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 03:11 | 12:20 | 02:52 +00:19 | 13:49 -01:29 |
| Running 3 | 04:41 | 15:31 | 05:18 -00:37 | 16:41 -01:10 |
| Sled Pull | 04:30 | 20:12 | 04:49 -00:19 | 21:59 -01:47 |
| Running 4 | 04:35 | 24:42 | 05:16 -00:41 | 26:48 -02:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:25 | 29:17 | 05:07 +00:18 | 32:04 -02:47 |
| Running 5 | 07:01 | 34:42 | 05:26 +01:35 | 37:11 -02:29 |
| Rowing | 04:31 | 41:43 | 04:46 -00:15 | 42:37 -00:54 |
| Running 6 | 04:50 | 46:14 | 05:18 -00:28 | 47:23 -01:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:32 | 51:04 | 02:08 +00:24 | 52:41 -01:37 |
| Running 7 | 04:46 | 53:36 | 05:17 -00:31 | 54:49 -01:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:08 | 58:22 | 04:57 +00:11 | 01:00:06 -01:44 |
| Running 8 | 05:45 | 01:03:30 | 05:51 -00:06 | 01:05:03 -01:33 |
| Wall Balls | 07:52 | 01:09:15 | 06:16 +01:36 | 01:10:54 -01:39 |
| Roxzone | 06:47 | 01:23:47 | 06:37 +00:10 | 01:23:47 |
Michael's best running lap was 00:03:58, which was 00:27 faster than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he has a strong running ability and was able to maintain a good pace throughout the race. However, his performance in certain segments could be improved to further enhance his overall result.
Additionally, Michael should prioritize efficient transitions between exercises to minimize time spent in the roxzone. Practicing quick transitions during his training sessions can help improve his overall race performance.
Overall, Michael's strong running performance and top percentile ranking indicate that he has a runner profile. To further improve his performance, he should focus on improving his strength and power in movements such as wall balls and burpees broad jump. Additionally, building overall fitness and improving transition times in the roxzone will help him achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nguyen Alexandre | 2024 Marseille | 01:23:48 | |
| Morariu Liviu | 2022 London | 01:23:28 | |
| Cabricano Pablo | 2022 Valencia | 01:24:08 | |
| Williams Brandon | 2023 Chicago | 01:23:41 | |
| Reeves Jonathan | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:23:36 | |
| Wormgoor Nando | 2024 Maastricht | 01:23:31 | |
| Wincott Reuben | 2023 Stockholm | 01:24:10 | |
| Gilbin Alexandre | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:24:10 | |
| Nicholas Stuart | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:24:17 | |
| Mckinstry Marc | 2024 Dublin | 01:24:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:27:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
