Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 222 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lowe Penny's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lowe Penny's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lowe Penny's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lowe Penny's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:03 | 07:12 to 06:09 | 31.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:50 | 05:53 to 05:03 | 25.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:43 | 04:33 to 03:50 | 21.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:22 | 05:19 to 04:57 | 11.1% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:10 to 05:02 | 4.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:54 to 04:47 | 3.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:42 to 02:36 | 3.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:48 to 05:48 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:09 to 41:09 | 0.0% |
| Lowe Penny | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:38 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:54 | 04:38 | 04:48 +00:06 | 04:36 +00:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 09:32 | 04:59 -00:09 | 09:24 +00:08 |
| Sled Push | 04:33 | 14:22 | 03:56 +00:37 | 14:23 -00:01 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 18:55 | 05:22 -00:23 | 18:19 +00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 05:48 | 23:54 | 06:30 -00:42 | 23:41 +00:13 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 29:42 | 05:23 -00:07 | 30:11 -00:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:19 | 34:58 | 05:06 +00:13 | 35:34 -00:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 40:17 | 05:26 -00:15 | 40:40 -00:23 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 45:28 | 05:04 +00:06 | 46:06 -00:38 |
| Running 6 | 05:05 | 50:38 | 05:23 -00:18 | 51:10 -00:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:42 | 55:43 | 02:43 -00:01 | 56:33 -00:50 |
| Running 7 | 05:09 | 58:25 | 05:26 -00:17 | 59:16 -00:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:53 | 01:03:34 | 05:13 +00:40 | 01:04:42 -01:08 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:09:27 | 05:56 +00:07 | 01:09:55 -00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 07:12 | 01:15:30 | 06:33 +00:39 | 01:15:51 -00:21 |
| Roxzone | 06:00 | 01:28:36 | 06:12 -00:12 | 01:28:36 |
Penny's best running lap was 00:04:38, showcasing her speed and efficiency in this segment. She also performed well in the Ski Erg, Running 2, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, Rowing, Running 6, and Running 7 segments, consistently finishing faster than the average. This indicates that she has a strong running profile and excels in these areas.
However, there were segments where Penny lost time compared to the average. The Sled Push, Sandbag Lunges, Farmers Carry, and Wall Balls were the segments where she struggled the most. These segments should be the focus of her improvement efforts.
In conclusion, Penny Lowe had a strong performance in the 2022 London Hyrox race, ranking in the top percentage of athletes in her age group and overall. To further improve her performance, she should focus on improving her performance in segments such as the Sled Push, Sandbag Lunges, Farmers Carry, and Wall Balls. By incorporating specific strength training exercises, improving her technique, and implementing effective race strategies, Penny can continue to excel and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chew Jolyn | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:28:54 | |
| Sastre Samaniego Sonia | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:33 | |
| Poelman Stephanie | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:28:27 | |
| Pötter Marie | 2019 Essen | 01:28:37 | |
| 窦 建云 | 2024 Beijing | 01:28:29 | |
| Evans Jasmin | 2024 London | 01:28:37 | |
| Mendez Valeria | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:28:20 | |
| Slater Charlotte | 2022 Birmingham | 01:28:36 | |
| Griffin Vicky | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:29:01 | |
| Jacobs MandyLee | 2024 Cape Town | 01:28:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:18:09 | |
| 2022 Las Vegas | 01:22:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
