Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 868 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Culley Louise's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Culley Louise's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Culley Louise's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Culley Louise's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:52 | 41:06 to 39:14 | 50.9% |
| Sled Push | 01:01 | 03:03 to 02:02 | 27.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 | 04:06 to 03:40 | 11.8% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 05:06 to 04:55 | 5.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 01:55 to 01:48 | 3.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:03 | 04:22 to 04:19 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:10 to 03:10 | 0.0% |
| Culley Louise | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:00 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 05:00 | 04:51 -00:11 | 04:36 +00:24 |
| Running 2 | 04:58 | 09:40 | 04:52 +00:06 | 09:27 +00:13 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 14:38 | 02:24 +00:39 | 14:19 +00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 17:41 | 05:06 +00:02 | 16:43 +00:58 |
| Sled Pull | 04:22 | 22:49 | 04:52 -00:30 | 21:49 +01:00 |
| Running 4 | 05:04 | 27:11 | 05:07 -00:03 | 26:41 +00:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:09 | 32:15 | 04:53 -00:44 | 31:48 +00:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:10 | 36:24 | 05:13 -00:03 | 36:41 -00:17 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 41:34 | 05:04 +00:02 | 41:54 -00:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 46:40 | 05:10 -00:02 | 46:58 -00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 51:48 | 02:00 -00:05 | 52:08 -00:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:05 | 53:43 | 05:07 -00:02 | 54:08 -00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:06 | 58:48 | 04:01 +00:05 | 59:15 -00:27 |
| Running 8 | 05:36 | 01:02:54 | 05:25 +00:11 | 01:03:16 -00:22 |
| Wall Balls | 03:10 | 01:08:30 | 03:59 -00:49 | 01:08:41 -00:11 |
| Roxzone | 06:41 | 01:18:13 | 05:33 +01:08 | 01:18:13 |
In terms of overall time, Louise completed the race in 01:18:13. Her total running time was 00:41:06, which was 01:27 slower than the average. This indicates that she could improve her overall fitness and transition time to enhance her performance in the race. Additionally, her best running lap was 00:04:58, showcasing her ability to maintain a good pace.
Overall, Louise Culley displayed strong athletic abilities in the 2022 London Hyrox race. By focusing on improving her running performance, reducing transition time in the roxzone, and implementing effective race strategies, she can further enhance her performance in future races. Incorporating specific training techniques and exercises tailored to her areas of improvement will contribute to her continued success in the sport.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schlotfeldt Hansen Nanna Sofia | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:17:51 | |
| Trafford Maisie | 2024 London | 01:18:02 | |
| Roche Janine | 2024 Madrid | 01:18:38 | |
| Drummond Jenna | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:18:43 | |
| Nakache Laurie | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:18:03 | |
| Cockle Hannah | 2024 Poznan | 01:18:42 | |
| Johnson Sophie | 2023 London | 01:17:58 | |
| Barbetmassin Emeline | 2023 München | 01:17:48 | |
| Mügge Leandra | 2022 Hamburg | 01:18:15 | |
| Oates Katie | 2024 Sydney | 01:18:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:16:18 | |
| 2023 London | 01:14:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
