Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Singapore using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 872 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Liew Ray's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Liew Ray's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Liew Ray's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Liew Ray's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:09 | 10:43 to 08:34 | 45.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:40 | 07:55 to 06:15 | 35.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:49 | 03:31 to 02:42 | 17.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:05 | 07:10 to 07:05 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:29 to 03:29 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:13 to 05:13 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:29 to 06:29 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 49:11 to 49:11 | 0.0% |
| Liew Ray | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:07 | 00:00 | 05:22 -00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:45 | 05:07 | 04:45 +00:00 | 05:22 -00:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 09:52 | 05:57 -00:14 | 10:07 -00:15 |
| Sled Push | 03:29 | 15:35 | 03:37 -00:08 | 16:04 -00:29 |
| Running 3 | 06:18 | 19:04 | 06:36 -00:18 | 19:41 -00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 07:55 | 25:22 | 06:18 +01:37 | 26:17 -00:55 |
| Running 4 | 06:06 | 33:17 | 06:35 -00:29 | 32:35 +00:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:10 | 39:23 | 07:13 -00:03 | 39:10 +00:13 |
| Running 5 | 06:33 | 46:33 | 06:52 -00:19 | 46:23 +00:10 |
| Rowing | 05:13 | 53:06 | 05:16 -00:03 | 53:15 -00:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:13 | 58:19 | 06:39 -00:26 | 58:31 -00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:31 | 01:04:32 | 02:41 +00:50 | 01:05:10 -00:38 |
| Running 7 | 06:03 | 01:08:03 | 06:37 -00:34 | 01:07:51 +00:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:29 | 01:14:06 | 06:45 -00:16 | 01:14:28 -00:22 |
| Running 8 | 07:13 | 01:20:35 | 07:54 -00:41 | 01:21:13 -00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 10:43 | 01:27:48 | 08:51 +01:52 | 01:29:07 -01:19 |
| Roxzone | 09:07 | 01:47:29 | 09:31 -00:24 | 01:47:29 |
Ray Liew finished in the top 47% overall and top 51% in his age group, indicating a commendable performance in a competitive field. His total running time was significantly faster than average, suggesting a strong running profile, but this was contrasted by slower-than-average strength components. Ray's running splits showed a progressively faster pace, indicating a conservative start with a strong finish, which is a good pacing strategy. However, his strength segments, particularly the Sled Pull and Wall Balls, were notably slower, showing room for improvement in strength exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Barner Nils | 2024 Köln | 01:46:59 | |
| Tan Zhi Sheng | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:47:08 | |
| Cervantes Francisco | 2023 Singapore | 01:47:42 | |
| Trovato Colin | 2024 New York | 01:47:27 | |
| Tay Aaron | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:47:26 | |
| Möller Tim | 2018 Hamburg | 01:47:46 | |
| Bood Jimmy | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:47:50 | |
| Bermúdez Arenas Guillermo Antonio | 2023 Malaga | 01:47:05 | |
| Bennett Harvey | 2024 Glasgow | 01:47:05 | |
| Enyioma Stephen | 2022 London | 01:47:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
