Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hörhold Clemens's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hörhold Clemens's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hörhold Clemens's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hörhold Clemens's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:23 | 48:50 to 45:27 | 77.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:28 | 05:47 to 05:19 | 10.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 | 07:16 to 07:05 | 4.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 03:15 to 03:07 | 3.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:27 to 02:19 | 3.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:05 | 05:59 to 05:54 | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Hörhold Clemens | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 04:56 -00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 04:51 | 04:34 -00:07 | 04:56 -00:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 09:18 | 05:22 +00:10 | 09:30 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 03:15 | 14:50 | 03:11 +00:04 | 14:52 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:11 | 18:05 | 05:53 +00:18 | 18:03 +00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 05:47 | 24:16 | 05:31 +00:16 | 23:56 +00:20 |
| Running 4 | 06:30 | 30:03 | 05:52 +00:38 | 29:27 +00:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:59 | 36:33 | 06:09 -00:10 | 35:19 +01:14 |
| Running 5 | 06:30 | 42:32 | 06:03 +00:27 | 41:28 +01:04 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 49:02 | 05:00 -00:16 | 47:31 +01:31 |
| Running 6 | 06:10 | 53:46 | 05:53 +00:17 | 52:31 +01:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:27 | 59:56 | 02:24 +00:03 | 58:24 +01:32 |
| Running 7 | 06:11 | 01:02:23 | 05:52 +00:19 | 01:00:48 +01:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:36 | 01:08:34 | 05:45 -01:09 | 01:06:40 +01:54 |
| Running 8 | 06:58 | 01:13:10 | 06:43 +00:15 | 01:12:25 +00:45 |
| Wall Balls | 07:16 | 01:20:08 | 07:26 -00:10 | 01:19:08 +01:00 |
| Roxzone | 07:18 | 01:34:34 | 08:00 -00:42 | 01:34:34 |
Clemens showed strength in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, where he performed faster than the average time. However, he struggled in several running segments, particularly Running 4, Running 5, Running 7, Running 3, Running 6, and Running 2, where he was slower than the average time. His best running lap was 00:04:51.
Overall, Clemens Hörhold had a solid performance in the 2023 München Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance and incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Offerdahl Mark | 2021 New York | 01:34:20 | |
| Cresswell Daniel | 2022 Birmingham | 01:34:10 | |
| Clark Richard | 2023 London | 01:34:05 | |
| Arrigucci Riccardo | 2024 Milan | 01:34:19 | |
| Brauer Sebastian | 2019 Hannover | 01:34:39 | |
| Biggs Stuart | 2023 Stockholm | 01:34:24 | |
| Faherty Kevin | 2024 Dallas | 01:34:20 | |
| Cairney Ryan | 2024 Paris | 01:34:05 | |
| Turner Nathan | 2023 Dallas | 01:34:24 | |
| Portlock Kris | 2023 London | 01:34:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Hannover | 01:25:16 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
