Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hayes Ric's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hayes Ric's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hayes Ric's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hayes Ric's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:05 | 06:10 to 05:05 | 34.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:04 | 05:58 to 04:54 | 33.5% |
| Run Total | 00:43 | 42:42 to 41:59 | 22.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:14 | 04:56 to 04:42 | 7.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:29 to 04:24 | 2.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:35 to 02:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:36 to 05:36 | 0.0% |
| Hayes Ric | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:45 | 00:00 | 04:39 -00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 03:45 | 04:27 +00:02 | 04:39 -00:54 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 08:14 | 05:00 +00:18 | 09:06 -00:52 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 13:32 | 02:56 -00:21 | 14:06 -00:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 16:07 | 05:26 -00:03 | 17:02 -00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 04:56 | 21:30 | 05:00 -00:04 | 22:28 -00:58 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 26:26 | 05:26 +00:05 | 27:28 -01:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:10 | 31:57 | 05:22 +00:48 | 32:54 -00:57 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 38:07 | 05:36 -00:05 | 38:16 -00:09 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 43:38 | 04:50 -00:11 | 43:52 -00:14 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 48:17 | 05:28 +00:12 | 48:42 -00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 53:57 | 02:12 -00:23 | 54:10 -00:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:43 | 55:46 | 05:26 +00:17 | 56:22 -00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:58 | 01:01:29 | 05:08 +00:50 | 01:01:48 -00:19 |
| Running 8 | 05:55 | 01:07:27 | 06:04 -00:09 | 01:06:56 +00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 05:36 | 01:13:22 | 06:35 -00:59 | 01:13:00 +00:22 |
| Roxzone | 07:42 | 01:26:32 | 06:57 +00:45 | 01:26:32 |
Ric Hayes has shown a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race. He ranked in the top 65% among all athletes and secured a place in the top 57% in his age group (45-49), which is a substantial achievement. His overall time was 01:26:32, which indicates his overall fitness and endurance level.
Notably, Ric demonstrated a strong running profile, with his total running time being 00:35 faster than average. This clearly indicates his excellent running skills and endurance. He also started strong, as evidenced by his Running 1 segment being 00:53 faster than average, suggesting an aggressive start.
Ric should consider adopting a more balanced pacing strategy. While starting strong in Running 1, he seemed to lose pace in later running segments. By conserving energy and maintaining a steady pace throughout, he could enhance his overall performance and reduce fatigue. Additionally, focusing on a swift transition between segments can significantly improve his Roxzone time. Ric should also consider incorporating a comprehensive warm-up and cool-down routine to prevent injuries and enhance recovery.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Foo Hong Khoo | 2024 Singapore | 01:26:05 | |
| Godinez Fonz | 2023 Anaheim | 01:26:59 | |
| Güttler Louis | 2024 Hamburg | 01:26:49 | |
| León Pérez Antonio | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:26:59 | |
| Cawley Daniel | 2023 Sydney | 01:26:27 | |
| Elliott Connor | 2024 Glasgow | 01:26:11 | |
| Aceto Michele | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:01 | |
| Riggs Cody | 2024 Houston | 01:26:50 | |
| Shannon Niall | 2024 Sydney | 01:26:18 | |
| Hayman Mark | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:26:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:28:19 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
