Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Opitz Andree's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Opitz Andree's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Opitz Andree's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Opitz Andree's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:52 | 05:42 to 04:50 | 39.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:41 | 03:19 to 02:38 | 31.1% |
| Run Total | 00:32 | 41:31 to 40:59 | 24.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:07 to 02:00 | 5.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:43 to 03:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Opitz Andree | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:49 | 00:00 | 04:34 +00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 04:49 | 04:25 -00:07 | 04:34 +00:15 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 09:07 | 04:53 +00:01 | 08:59 +00:08 |
| Sled Push | 03:19 | 14:01 | 02:52 +00:27 | 13:52 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 06:07 | 17:20 | 05:19 +00:48 | 16:44 +00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 03:43 | 23:27 | 04:50 -01:07 | 22:03 +01:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 27:10 | 05:17 -00:12 | 26:53 +00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:42 | 32:15 | 05:11 +00:31 | 32:10 +00:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 37:57 | 05:28 -00:17 | 37:21 +00:36 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 43:08 | 04:47 -00:13 | 42:49 +00:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 47:42 | 05:19 -00:16 | 47:36 +00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 52:45 | 02:08 -00:01 | 52:55 -00:10 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 54:52 | 05:18 -00:20 | 55:03 -00:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:25 | 59:50 | 04:59 -00:34 | 01:00:21 -00:31 |
| Running 8 | 05:28 | 01:04:15 | 05:53 -00:25 | 01:05:20 -01:05 |
| Wall Balls | 05:14 | 01:09:43 | 06:19 -01:05 | 01:11:13 -01:30 |
| Roxzone | 09:21 | 01:24:10 | 06:38 +02:43 | 01:24:10 |
Opitz had a strong performance in the Ski Erg and Sled Pull segments, where he was faster than the average time by 00:03 and 01:28, respectively. He also performed well in the Running 4, Farmers Carry, Running 7, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls segments, where he was faster than the average time by 00:13, 00:05, 00:21, 00:31, and 01:07, respectively.
However, Opitz struggled in several segments, including the Roxzone, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 3, Best Lap, and Running 1. He spent 00:09:21 in the Roxzone, which was 02:54 slower than the average time. He also performed 00:51 slower than the average time in the Burpees Broad Jump segment, 00:46 slower in Running 3, 00:25 slower in the Best Lap, and 00:25 slower in Running 1.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Andree Opitz can enhance his performance in future HYROX races and achieve better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wickham Oliver | 2024 London | 01:24:33 | |
| Vitoux Charles | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:24:37 | |
| Zaun Andreas | 2020 Hannover | 01:23:50 | |
| Peeters Martijn | 2024 Maastricht | 01:24:14 | |
| Sutherland Jordan | 2023 Glasgow | 01:24:24 | |
| Marguin Robinson | 2023 Barcelona | 01:24:11 | |
| Lee Roger | 2024 Perth | 01:23:50 | |
| Böhm Gerhard | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:24:05 | |
| Städter Benjamin | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:28 | |
| Rasom Matteo | 2023 Rimini | 01:24:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
