Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cheang Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cheang Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cheang Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cheang Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:51 | 45:30 to 41:39 | 65.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:33 | 05:23 to 04:50 | 9.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 05:08 to 04:38 | 8.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 03:07 to 02:42 | 7.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:21 to 02:03 | 5.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:37 to 04:23 | 4.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:54 to 02:54 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:47 to 05:47 | 0.0% |
| Cheang Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:07 | 00:00 | 04:37 -00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 04:07 | 04:27 +00:10 | 04:37 -00:30 |
| Running 2 | 07:33 | 08:44 | 04:58 +02:35 | 09:04 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 03:07 | 16:17 | 02:54 +00:13 | 14:02 +02:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:33 | 19:24 | 05:25 +00:08 | 16:56 +02:28 |
| Sled Pull | 05:08 | 24:57 | 04:58 +00:10 | 22:21 +02:36 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 30:05 | 05:23 +00:09 | 27:19 +02:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:54 | 35:37 | 05:19 -02:25 | 32:42 +02:55 |
| Running 5 | 05:21 | 38:31 | 05:34 -00:13 | 38:01 +00:30 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 43:52 | 04:49 -00:08 | 43:35 +00:17 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 48:33 | 05:26 +00:00 | 48:24 +00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 53:59 | 02:11 +00:10 | 53:50 +00:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:30 | 56:20 | 05:24 +00:06 | 56:01 +00:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:23 | 01:01:50 | 05:06 +00:17 | 01:01:25 +00:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:31 | 01:07:13 | 06:01 +00:30 | 01:06:31 +00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 05:47 | 01:13:44 | 06:32 -00:45 | 01:12:32 +01:12 |
| Roxzone | 06:36 | 01:25:59 | 06:55 -00:19 | 01:25:59 |
Matthew Cheang, participating in the 16-24 age group category, displayed an impressive performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race. His overall rank of 776 placed him in the top 64% of all athletes and his age group rank of 76 positioned him in the top 68% of his age group. His total race time was 01:25:59, with a total running time of 00:45:30, which was 02:28 slower than the average time of his age group. Matthew's profile suggests that he excels more in strength-related activities rather than running, as reflected in his running time. This analysis also reveals that Matthew had a relatively fast start to the race, with his running 1 split being 00:29 faster than average. However, his pace seemed to slow down in the subsequent running segments.
Matthew should consider adopting the following strategies during his race for a better performance:
With the right training and strategies, Matthew has the potential to significantly improve his performance in the next race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Otterbein Florian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:25:50 | |
| Rostami Majid | 2024 Dublin | 01:26:12 | |
| Petersen Nick | 2024 Hamburg | 01:26:07 | |
| Cornfield Zachary | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:49 | |
| Pollock Matthew | 2024 Brisbane | 01:26:26 | |
| Engelen Tom | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:25:58 | |
| Martin Thomas | 2024 Stockholm | 01:26:27 | |
| Cano Skerdi | 2024 Milan | 01:25:36 | |
| Mcdonald Nick | 2024 Brisbane | 01:25:56 | |
| Roberts Dean | 2024 Marseille | 01:25:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
