Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 868 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Brandes Annika's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Brandes Annika's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Brandes Annika's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Brandes Annika's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 01:00 | 02:48 to 01:48 | 39.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:37 | 02:39 to 02:02 | 24.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:27 | 03:49 to 03:22 | 17.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:22 | 04:41 to 04:19 | 14.4% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:01 to 04:55 | 3.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:42 to 04:41 | 0.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:27 to 03:27 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:02 to 39:02 | 0.0% |
| Brandes Annika | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 04:45 | 04:51 -00:09 | 04:36 +00:09 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 09:27 | 04:52 -00:05 | 09:27 +00:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 14:14 | 02:24 +00:15 | 14:19 -00:05 |
| Running 3 | 04:41 | 16:53 | 05:06 -00:25 | 16:43 +00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 21:34 | 04:52 -00:11 | 21:49 -00:15 |
| Running 4 | 04:47 | 26:15 | 05:07 -00:20 | 26:41 -00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:01 | 31:02 | 04:53 -00:52 | 31:48 -00:46 |
| Running 5 | 04:57 | 35:03 | 05:13 -00:16 | 36:41 -01:38 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 40:00 | 05:04 -00:03 | 41:54 -01:54 |
| Running 6 | 04:56 | 45:01 | 05:10 -00:14 | 46:58 -01:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:48 | 49:57 | 02:00 +00:48 | 52:08 -02:11 |
| Running 7 | 04:55 | 52:45 | 05:07 -00:12 | 54:08 -01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:27 | 57:40 | 04:01 -00:34 | 59:15 -01:35 |
| Running 8 | 05:18 | 01:01:07 | 05:25 -00:07 | 01:03:16 -02:09 |
| Wall Balls | 03:49 | 01:06:25 | 03:59 -00:10 | 01:08:41 -02:16 |
| Roxzone | 08:06 | 01:18:13 | 05:33 +02:33 | 01:18:13 |
Annika's overall time of 01:18:13 is impressive, and her total running time of 00:39:02 is particularly noteworthy, as it is 00:37 faster than the average for her finish time. This indicates that Annika has a strong running profile and excels in this aspect of the race. Her best running lap time of 00:04:41 further supports this, showcasing her speed and endurance.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on improving the identified segments, Annika can further enhance her performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Allais Alicia | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:18:40 | |
| Cave Ceri | 2024 Katowice | 01:18:33 | |
| Nolden Verena | 2024 Köln | 01:17:45 | |
| Monti Antonella Karla | 2024 Madrid | 01:18:10 | |
| Motschiedler Jasmin | 2024 Köln | 01:18:06 | |
| Gonzalez Sandra | 2023 Melbourne | 01:18:28 | |
| Cohen Farah | 2024 Marseille | 01:18:01 | |
| Quinke Loreen | 2024 Hamburg | 01:18:03 | |
| Christian Hannah | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:18:37 | |
| Macrae Brooke | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
